Dan Epps

Yeah. It's also just interesting, again, since this is the first of what I think is going to be many Trump TRO cases, it's just an interesting message generally about these. And then, of course, it's literally a non-message, right? Yeah. We're doing nothing for no reasons. Yeah.

Yeah. It's also just interesting, again, since this is the first of what I think is going to be many Trump TRO cases, it's just an interesting message generally about these. And then, of course, it's literally a non-message, right? Yeah. We're doing nothing for no reasons. Yeah.

I'm going to do a lot of held in the bands. No, your request for a meeting is held in the bands. Well, we've got a case about that, right? Indeed. In talking about in a minute. Yeah. I think both signals, like the court is watching these things. They're not rushing into it. They're a little worried about the procedural posture. If you want to be sure to get the court's attention. Yeah.

I'm going to do a lot of held in the bands. No, your request for a meeting is held in the bands. Well, we've got a case about that, right? Indeed. In talking about in a minute. Yeah. I think both signals, like the court is watching these things. They're not rushing into it. They're a little worried about the procedural posture. If you want to be sure to get the court's attention. Yeah.

it's not going to just breeze past the appealability of a TRO problem, but it's not gonna, you know, do nothing either.

it's not going to just breeze past the appealability of a TRO problem, but it's not gonna, you know, do nothing either.

So.

So.

Yeah.

Yeah.

Right. So if I go to a police officer and tell them, like, Dan, Jay walked last year, they can't arrest you for it. without watching you to see if you jaywalk again.

Right. So if I go to a police officer and tell them, like, Dan, Jay walked last year, they can't arrest you for it. without watching you to see if you jaywalk again.

Yeah, I agree. And does this play into—it obviously plays into debates about originalism. Does this also play into the debates about how the Fourth Amendment relates to positive law and general law? Because the common law—

Yeah, I agree. And does this play into—it obviously plays into debates about originalism. Does this also play into the debates about how the Fourth Amendment relates to positive law and general law? Because the common law—

Yeah. And then they also say this case is sort of more complicated because it also implicates the Nightwalker statutes, which are another one of these pieces of English history that I feel like come up in Fourth Amendment cases a lot.

Yeah. And then they also say this case is sort of more complicated because it also implicates the Nightwalker statutes, which are another one of these pieces of English history that I feel like come up in Fourth Amendment cases a lot.

Well, in a world without artificial light, they were kind of scary. Yeah. Didn't they bump into things? Yeah. Um, or would they otherwise up to no good? I think that's one of the reasons this is a statement of respecting denial is that, uh, just as so Meyer says, I don't know if she really means it, you know, therefore maybe this is not a great vehicle.

Well, in a world without artificial light, they were kind of scary. Yeah. Didn't they bump into things? Yeah. Um, or would they otherwise up to no good? I think that's one of the reasons this is a statement of respecting denial is that, uh, just as so Meyer says, I don't know if she really means it, you know, therefore maybe this is not a great vehicle.

Also maybe Gonzalez committed felony trespass and then that would trigger a different rule, but we should, you know, we should get back into the question of misdemeanor arrests for misdemeanors, not committed to the presidency officer. Um,

Also maybe Gonzalez committed felony trespass and then that would trigger a different rule, but we should, you know, we should get back into the question of misdemeanor arrests for misdemeanors, not committed to the presidency officer. Um,