Dan Houser

You can still make something that's really interesting that isn't super cinematic, but it's an interesting experience in some ways.

But the second you're involving actors and motion capture and one of those big experiences, it's going to cost some money.

So therefore, if you want to do that, you've got to figure out what companies you want to work out and figure out how you get to work there.

Yes.

Limited.

Absolutely.

If used correctly, it will be a great tool.

If used incorrectly, it will lead to loads of generic stuff.

You know, I've been in games for 29 years and all the time, the piece of tech that's going to make making games much easier and much cheaper is about to turn up.

And all that's happened is the games have got much better and way more expensive.

So I'm always nervous about saying, finally, we have that bit of tech that makes our lives easier.

But it looks as if it might be able to do that when you use it in the right way.

If you use it to try and substitute for creativity, it's going to be really generic.

To watch the universe.

The easiest plausible answer is we are designed by the universe to watch itself and to comment on it in interesting ways.

It's the only thing that makes it possibly worth doing.

Everything else, everything material is irrelevant.

So the only things of value are these immaterial things.

You know, I do think metaphysics always trumps physics for me.

What a pleasure.