Dan Pfeiffer

We were like, Jack Smith's testifying?

What's happening?

How much does this matter?

It's just this is going to go.

I guess they're trying to investigate Jack Smith.

These are the Congresses.

Donald Trump was like responded by being like, you know, Pam Bondi should do something, of course.

I saw that Hank Johnson, Democrat on the committee, asked at one point, since the charges were dismissed without prejudice after Trump won, they asked Smith, could he be charged again after he leaves office?

And, you know, Smith didn't really take the bait, but did say that they were dismissed without prejudice, which means, yes, they can be charged again.

Remember, the immunity ruling sort of lopped off a big part of the indictment, but some of it still remained.

Like if before Trump won, we still thought there was going to remember there was still going to be a there's still going to be a case.

My thing is, like, you know, good for Jack Smith.

There's things he couldn't talk about based on sort of evidence.

Like, what I'm interested in someday is, you know, evidence that Jack Smith had that he was going to bring it to trial that we haven't heard yet.

And, you know, same in the documents case if Eileen Cannon ever...

I mean, she won't, but if anyone can ever get that evidence, that would interest me.

Not us because we wouldn't get invited.

It'll be Brian.

You might not be, you might not be invited.

I, yeah, no, I might be invited.