Dan Shipper

I don't know, Dan, if you know about that.

I mean, over time... It should not be over time because each chat is like...

basically new the overtime thing would be as the maybe as the models get updated the like harness is not as good and luckily you know this is based on open claw so that this plus ones are based on open cost and we don't necessarily have to worry about that so much on all of our products i i have this like philosophy of your job building products in ai is to surf the models

And what that means is every time there is a new model update, you have to figure out how to use your product, how to build your product, and also modify your workflow to get the absolute most you can out of the model.

And that's the way that you take advantage of model progress, and that's the way you don't get your…

your lunch eaten basically by like models getting good enough that you don't need an app.

And what that requires though, is you have to be willing to throw out your whole product or most of your product and a lot of your workflow every three to six months as the models change.

And that kind of sucks, but also it's kind of awesome because

you get to continually push the frontier and it's so much easier now to like rebuild products.

Yeah.

And so I think that also kind of takes care of model drift.

Like I'm not, I'm not necessarily at this point trying to make something that like lasts, like make one piece of software that lasts for a long time.

I'm trying to solve a, a, a task or a workflow for a certain kind of person.

And that will take many forms as the models get better, but it will still be a thing that people need to solve.

Yeah.

Which, which it always was before.

It's just the rate of progress was slow enough that you could, you could like sort of kid yourself that you just do one thing and it's, it's always good, you know?

And that just was never the case.

Those were the days.

Yeah.