David Carney

How do we start decentralizing it more so that we can enable these different teams and pockets of the company to work more independently with each other or to work independently to solve particular domain problems while still, I guess, enabling the velocity and freedom of access to required information.

So I think, I think tail scale is actually a way that companies can do that.

I think there's just lots of different approaches, but tail scale definitely makes it easy.

It's just like, okay, well instead of like one gigantic monolithic network, like maybe you start building like one tail net per workload, for instance.

And we've seen this kind of thing with people who are playing around with Kubernetes and

And they have custom internal tooling that they need, like some kind of internal monitoring system that's like, oh no, when we bring up a cluster, we've got these applications that need to sit inside of it.

It has to sort of moderate or govern certain kinds of networking access.

We do a bunch of log analysis.

Maybe we do a bunch of real-time stuff, like how do we...

How do we insert these applications that we've built into these networks in an isolated way?

And so I think there's a lot of internal applications inside of companies that need to stay internal and private.

Tailscale is good for that kind of thing.

You can retrofit them inside of TSNet and then you can encapsulate entire workloads inside of Tailnet themselves.

And it helps people reason much more about safety and security that way.

Yeah.

I mean, there's been a couple.

Yeah.

No, no, it's good.

In fact, I'm sure our product team will watch this video and maybe think more about the name.

We've been debating it internally of what to call these things.