David Sachs

If a second Trump administration is highly transactional, it's going to be far more difficult because competing with BRI requires a more farsighted approach to and also a kind of broader thinking about the costs and benefits of international assistance and loans and aid.

There is a consensus that the United States should not try to match China dollar for dollar around the world. That's just not a game we can play and that we can win it. So if China is building a road of We're not going to say we will build this road in a neighboring country for cheaper or the same price. We just don't have that advantage.

There is a consensus that the United States should not try to match China dollar for dollar around the world. That's just not a game we can play and that we can win it. So if China is building a road of We're not going to say we will build this road in a neighboring country for cheaper or the same price. We just don't have that advantage.

We don't have that kind of state-backed support that China can bring to the table. So the question is really, what are the strategic sectors that we should compete in? And I think that the Lobito corridor shows that.

We don't have that kind of state-backed support that China can bring to the table. So the question is really, what are the strategic sectors that we should compete in? And I think that the Lobito corridor shows that.

This is a signature foreign policy initiative of Xi Jinping. It has been incorporated into the Chinese Communist Party constitution. This is not something that Xi Jinping is attempting to distance himself from. It is actually something that Xi Jinping is trying to lean into. And I also think that right now there is a certain geopolitical logic for Beijing to continue down this path.

This is a signature foreign policy initiative of Xi Jinping. It has been incorporated into the Chinese Communist Party constitution. This is not something that Xi Jinping is attempting to distance himself from. It is actually something that Xi Jinping is trying to lean into. And I also think that right now there is a certain geopolitical logic for Beijing to continue down this path.

Words. Cameron or Tyler, do you want to?

Words. Cameron or Tyler, do you want to?

Words. Cameron or Tyler, do you want to?

Actually, Cameron, I think you said something earlier that I thought was really profound. You said that a year ago you thought it would be more likely that you'd end up in jail at the White House. Not to put you on the spot, because you didn't do anything wrong, but that was the environment a year ago. But do you guys want to say something?

Actually, Cameron, I think you said something earlier that I thought was really profound. You said that a year ago you thought it would be more likely that you'd end up in jail at the White House. Not to put you on the spot, because you didn't do anything wrong, but that was the environment a year ago. But do you guys want to say something?

Actually, Cameron, I think you said something earlier that I thought was really profound. You said that a year ago you thought it would be more likely that you'd end up in jail at the White House. Not to put you on the spot, because you didn't do anything wrong, but that was the environment a year ago. But do you guys want to say something?

You better clear that Solana position. What's your lockup? 24 months? Fuck no. He's trying to sell it to me on text message. Yeah, of course he is. We're negotiating discounts.

You better clear that Solana position. What's your lockup? 24 months? Fuck no. He's trying to sell it to me on text message. Yeah, of course he is. We're negotiating discounts.

You better clear that Solana position. What's your lockup? 24 months? Fuck no. He's trying to sell it to me on text message. Yeah, of course he is. We're negotiating discounts.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Thank you.

The reign of terror against crypto is over. And the beginning of innovation in America for crypto has just begun.