David Sachs

And I think that the government sees its role, at least when it's thinking properly about this as being an enabler and is just setting the rules of the road and maybe putting in some guardrails.

But basically, it's letting the entrepreneurs cook.

And that's how you get innovation.

And now I don't want to bash our European host too much.

But, you know, when when when the EU talks about AI leadership,

they're talking about the regulators and they think their value add is, well, we're going to show the whole world the regulatory model for AI.

So it's kind of a bad case of main character syndrome where, you know, where like the regulators think they're the main characters in this.

No, look, the regulators are the supporting players.

The main characters always have to be the entrepreneurs.

It's got to be the innovators.

That's how you unlock innovation.

When the

When you start to see yourself, I mean, the regulators and the policymakers as the main characters, that's not a great recipe for innovation.

Well, I think there are Orwellian scenarios of AI that I think we should be concerned about.

And again, I tend to think that those scenarios were described by George Orwell, not by James Cameron and the Terminator.

And specifically, it's misuse of AI by government.

I do think that

AI could be used as a tool to surveil, to censor, to even potentially brainwash the population.

This is why the administration has taken such a firm stance against what is called woke AI, which I almost think that that name maybe trivializes the magnitude of the problem we're talking about.

We're talking about AI having a political bias built into it.