David Sacks

is disturbing, and I'm glad to see that under President Trump, the Department of State is pushing back on this.

I think, Sarah, the work that you're doing and Secretary Rubio, extremely important.

So I think you're making a huge difference.

I think we have to use the tools that we have, whether they're tools on trade or the denial of visas or expressing condemnation, to push back on this as we will, as we can.

Let's talk about some of the new issues.

uh ai uh it was pretty obvious but 18 months ago when you saw a deep fake it just didn't pass the uncanny valley uh grok images uh nano banana from our friends at google i mean these things now if you're if you're flipping by very quickly

you could make a mistake this also uh in terms of censorship we have significant protections in the united states for say cartoonists as do the french and they're mocking public figures how is it different when you're mocking public figures uh presidents prime ministers cabinet members

but the public can't tell?

Because this is new.

And that doesn't mean that... And we have child protection and underage laws.

Those are very strong.

And fraud.

Just because you don't have AI-specific laws doesn't mean that you can do whatever you want with AI.

You could still use AI as a tool to then break the law and be prosecuted.

I mean, if you engage in cyber hacking, for example, and you use AI to do it, you're guilty of a cyber crime.

So there's a lot of things like that where...

there are plenty of existing laws that apply to AI, and we should just think about using all of those before you start then creating a bunch of AI-specific ones.

Yeah, if those didn't cover it, then there would be, hey, maybe we need to have a thoughtful discussion because, you know, I'm trying to think of an edge case here, but for cybersecurity, it's even hard to do.

Like, using voice clones, it's just fraud, you know?

It's wire fraud, you know?