David Sacks

How do we actually do it?

Or do you think that this should remain a private market effort?

You've been criticized by many for being against the billionaire tax.

I think you're the only candidate running for governor right now that has spoken out against it.

I've heard your comments on it.

Obviously, I think I was probably the first to identify it and bring it up on my show when it first came out the day it was filed.

For me, it's fundamental to private property rights.

If you can take people's assets after they've paid taxes on it, there's no stopping that train.

I mean, why not take everyone's assets

at some point.

You pay your income tax, that's your private property, you get to keep it.

Shouldn't be that the legislator can later say, I'll take 10% of what you own.

That just seems wrong to me.

Do you think we need to have a continued increase?

Do you think we need to maintain the temporary high income taxes in California?

What's your general view on revenue?

We've talked a lot about you think, hey, we don't need to rely on growing revenue.

But based on the current tax system in California,

What else do you think needs to change?

Or do you think it's just like, let's leave it as is, no billionaire tax, no new taxes, but let's just not go back?