David
š¤ SpeakerVoice Profile Active
This person's voice can be automatically recognized across podcast episodes using AI voice matching.
Appearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
There's, like, a bunch of people that don't eat pork. Wow. Which, you start to look at how many people don't eat pork.
There's, like, a bunch of people that don't eat pork. Wow. Which, you start to look at how many people don't eat pork.
Yeah, maybe they're onto something. Um, but then I think like, I don't know, I think all the faiths that have persisted probably have a lot of roots of the same things that help society prosper.
Yeah, maybe they're onto something. Um, but then I think like, I don't know, I think all the faiths that have persisted probably have a lot of roots of the same things that help society prosper.
Yeah, maybe they're onto something. Um, but then I think like, I don't know, I think all the faiths that have persisted probably have a lot of roots of the same things that help society prosper.
To a point. But we also live in a non-theocratic society. Yes. So like, as someone that lives in America that likes religious freedom, I also don't want to be bound by the mandates of any specific religion.
To a point. But we also live in a non-theocratic society. Yes. So like, as someone that lives in America that likes religious freedom, I also don't want to be bound by the mandates of any specific religion.
To a point. But we also live in a non-theocratic society. Yes. So like, as someone that lives in America that likes religious freedom, I also don't want to be bound by the mandates of any specific religion.
Whether that be Islam or Christianity or Judaism. Right. Because it infringes on your personal freedom.
Whether that be Islam or Christianity or Judaism. Right. Because it infringes on your personal freedom.
Whether that be Islam or Christianity or Judaism. Right. Because it infringes on your personal freedom.
It would be nice if there was a Catholic country that existed that had some type of Catholic theocratic laws that if I so chose, I could move to. But I like to live in America where people can practice freely whatever they want.
It would be nice if there was a Catholic country that existed that had some type of Catholic theocratic laws that if I so chose, I could move to. But I like to live in America where people can practice freely whatever they want.
It would be nice if there was a Catholic country that existed that had some type of Catholic theocratic laws that if I so chose, I could move to. But I like to live in America where people can practice freely whatever they want.
Right. I could also argue this is, I think, a slippery slope argument. Like, it seems fallacious on its onset to say, like, the logical conclusion of XYZ philosophy is decimation of a population. Because you could say the inverse, that, you know, the logical conclusion of, like, a hyper-religious society is going to be, like, oppression of women and gay people getting murdered.
Right. I could also argue this is, I think, a slippery slope argument. Like, it seems fallacious on its onset to say, like, the logical conclusion of XYZ philosophy is decimation of a population. Because you could say the inverse, that, you know, the logical conclusion of, like, a hyper-religious society is going to be, like, oppression of women and gay people getting murdered.
Right. I could also argue this is, I think, a slippery slope argument. Like, it seems fallacious on its onset to say, like, the logical conclusion of XYZ philosophy is decimation of a population. Because you could say the inverse, that, you know, the logical conclusion of, like, a hyper-religious society is going to be, like, oppression of women and gay people getting murdered.
Right, you can make the exact same argument in, yeah, just an oppressive way. So to me, it seems kind of misguided. I don't know if that was intention, but I think it's framed poorly.
Right, you can make the exact same argument in, yeah, just an oppressive way. So to me, it seems kind of misguided. I don't know if that was intention, but I think it's framed poorly.
Right, you can make the exact same argument in, yeah, just an oppressive way. So to me, it seems kind of misguided. I don't know if that was intention, but I think it's framed poorly.