Demis Hassabis

And then maybe to fill that out, you would also check the consistency, you know, make sure there's no holes,

in that system either.

Yeah, that would be amazing.

So it's not just helping us do that, but actually coming up with something brand new.

Something like that.

Exactly.

It's like, what is this amazing physics idea?

And then we would probably check it with world experts in that domain, right?

And validate it and kind of go through its workings.

And I guess it would be explaining its workings too.

Yeah.

Be an amazing moment.

Well, it may be pretty complicated.

So it could be the analogy I give there is I don't think it will be totally mysterious to the best human scientists.

But it may be a bit like, for example, in chess, if I was to talk to Garry Kasparov or Magnus Carlsen and play a game with them and they make a brilliant move.

I might not be able to come up with that move, but they could explain why afterwards that move made sense.

And we would be able to understand it to some degree, not to the level they do.

But, you know, if they were good at explaining, which is actually part of intelligence, too, is being able to explain in a simple way that what you're thinking about.

I think that that will be very possible for the best human scientists.

It could be.