Dennis Mortensen

a better measure.

So 83%, which was the last kind of look at of all the meetings that we do, are rated five stars, as in we apply the option for people to rate the dialogue.

Exactly.

What I'm saying is, in that regard, that's certainly what we see that the vast majority are ending up successful when they don't end up successful.

The funny thing is, what you described is actually not what we see that often.

It is when the thread length goes beyond a certain inflection point.

What we tend to optimize on is to shorten the thread length, as in, what is the minimum amount of emails or the least amount of communication which I can do with you to get the meeting on the calendar?

The less we have to talk, the better we tend to be off.

They're saying, can you do next Wednesday at 1?

If I can make a prediction for Wednesday,

be a good time, that'll be awesome.

But you can just say, sure, let's do that.

So that is the vast majority.

Yeah.

So we spent the first three years in the basement running a free beta, given the kind of complexity of what we're trying to solve here, where it's very easy to imagine.

But as you just described, solving language is pretty fucking hard.

It's really difficult.

And started kind of charging for it a good year back.

That is not public, but again, setting up hundreds of thousands of meetings.

But to give you some scope here, there's about 10 billion formal meetings being set up in the US alone every year.