Derek Thompson

is the tension between process versus outcomes in government. I think maybe the best way to make this tension crystal clear to people is to see it through a prism that you call everything bagel liberalism. Why don't you do here for everything bagel liberalism what I asked you to do at the top of the show for supply side liberalism? What is this idea? Where did it emerge from?

And why is it important?

And why is it important?

And why is it important?

The chapters in this book are housing, energy, government, science, and technology. And I do think that one of the strengths of the final product is the rhyming of themes. One wouldn't necessarily think that the problems in construction would be similar to the problems in, say, biomedical breakthroughs.

The chapters in this book are housing, energy, government, science, and technology. And I do think that one of the strengths of the final product is the rhyming of themes. One wouldn't necessarily think that the problems in construction would be similar to the problems in, say, biomedical breakthroughs.

The chapters in this book are housing, energy, government, science, and technology. And I do think that one of the strengths of the final product is the rhyming of themes. One wouldn't necessarily think that the problems in construction would be similar to the problems in, say, biomedical breakthroughs.

But in fact, we have empirical evidence showing that productivity in construction is flatlining or down, at the same time that we have evidence that productivity in biomedical science is flat or down. The same way that you just pointed out that an abundance, unfortunately, of paperwork is slowing down the construction of affordable housing in places like California.

But in fact, we have empirical evidence showing that productivity in construction is flatlining or down, at the same time that we have evidence that productivity in biomedical science is flat or down. The same way that you just pointed out that an abundance, unfortunately, of paperwork is slowing down the construction of affordable housing in places like California.

But in fact, we have empirical evidence showing that productivity in construction is flatlining or down, at the same time that we have evidence that productivity in biomedical science is flat or down. The same way that you just pointed out that an abundance, unfortunately, of paperwork is slowing down the construction of affordable housing in places like California.

Well, if you look at American science, By some surveys, scientists say they spend between 30 and 40% of their time filling out paperwork, either filing for grants or checking the boxes after those grants are filed or won. And so in many cases, the problems that governance has and the problems that liberalism has developed

Well, if you look at American science, By some surveys, scientists say they spend between 30 and 40% of their time filling out paperwork, either filing for grants or checking the boxes after those grants are filed or won. And so in many cases, the problems that governance has and the problems that liberalism has developed

Well, if you look at American science, By some surveys, scientists say they spend between 30 and 40% of their time filling out paperwork, either filing for grants or checking the boxes after those grants are filed or won. And so in many cases, the problems that governance has and the problems that liberalism has developed

rhyme across housing and energy and building and government and science and technology itself. And so I do think it's one strength of the book is the degree to which without pushing on this rhyming too hard, you can see the same problems raise their head again and again and again in place after place.

rhyme across housing and energy and building and government and science and technology itself. And so I do think it's one strength of the book is the degree to which without pushing on this rhyming too hard, you can see the same problems raise their head again and again and again in place after place.

rhyme across housing and energy and building and government and science and technology itself. And so I do think it's one strength of the book is the degree to which without pushing on this rhyming too hard, you can see the same problems raise their head again and again and again in place after place.

Yes.

Yes.

Yes.

I think that the way that we fund science in this country is A, unbelievably important. The National Institutes of Health is probably the most important biomedical institution in the world. B, it hasn't changed very much in the last 70 years.