Derek Thompson
๐ค SpeakerAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
I think that the way that we fund science in this country is A, unbelievably important. The National Institutes of Health is probably the most important biomedical institution in the world. B, it hasn't changed very much in the last 70 years.
I think that the way that we fund science in this country is A, unbelievably important. The National Institutes of Health is probably the most important biomedical institution in the world. B, it hasn't changed very much in the last 70 years.
And if you or anybody listening knows anything about bureaucracies, if a bureaucracy doesn't experience some kind of institutional renewal generation after generation, it's going to build a series of habits that even its practitioners agree are bad. And in fact, the scientists, the practitioners that I spoke to about the way the NIH works
And if you or anybody listening knows anything about bureaucracies, if a bureaucracy doesn't experience some kind of institutional renewal generation after generation, it's going to build a series of habits that even its practitioners agree are bad. And in fact, the scientists, the practitioners that I spoke to about the way the NIH works
And if you or anybody listening knows anything about bureaucracies, if a bureaucracy doesn't experience some kind of institutional renewal generation after generation, it's going to build a series of habits that even its practitioners agree are bad. And in fact, the scientists, the practitioners that I spoke to about the way the NIH works
told me pretty much invariably that it was biased against the most important high-risk research, that it tended to waste scientists' time, and that it advantaged conservative ideas and older scientists while we have a good understanding that much of the best work that's been done in scientific history
told me pretty much invariably that it was biased against the most important high-risk research, that it tended to waste scientists' time, and that it advantaged conservative ideas and older scientists while we have a good understanding that much of the best work that's been done in scientific history
told me pretty much invariably that it was biased against the most important high-risk research, that it tended to waste scientists' time, and that it advantaged conservative ideas and older scientists while we have a good understanding that much of the best work that's been done in scientific history
been radical ideas from young scientists i mean this is absolutely core to a kuhnian theory of paradigm shifts the idea that it was not a group of you know graybeards who came up with quantum mechanics the 1900s 1910s 1920s it was people like einstein and planck building on a couple discrepancies that they were finding in the record to build an entirely new theory of how the world works that has in fact been core to not only the development of nuclear power
been radical ideas from young scientists i mean this is absolutely core to a kuhnian theory of paradigm shifts the idea that it was not a group of you know graybeards who came up with quantum mechanics the 1900s 1910s 1920s it was people like einstein and planck building on a couple discrepancies that they were finding in the record to build an entirely new theory of how the world works that has in fact been core to not only the development of nuclear power
been radical ideas from young scientists i mean this is absolutely core to a kuhnian theory of paradigm shifts the idea that it was not a group of you know graybeards who came up with quantum mechanics the 1900s 1910s 1920s it was people like einstein and planck building on a couple discrepancies that they were finding in the record to build an entirely new theory of how the world works that has in fact been core to not only the development of nuclear power
but also the electronics revolution. Great ideas often come from young scientists, and it is young scientists who say the system isn't working. There's a great quote from John Dench, who serves as the director of research and development in functional genomics at the Broad Institute. And he told me, people need to understand how broken the system is
but also the electronics revolution. Great ideas often come from young scientists, and it is young scientists who say the system isn't working. There's a great quote from John Dench, who serves as the director of research and development in functional genomics at the Broad Institute. And he told me, people need to understand how broken the system is
but also the electronics revolution. Great ideas often come from young scientists, and it is young scientists who say the system isn't working. There's a great quote from John Dench, who serves as the director of research and development in functional genomics at the Broad Institute. And he told me, people need to understand how broken the system is
So many really intelligent people are wasting their time doing really, really uninteresting things. Writing progress reports, coming up with modular budgets five years in advance of the science. I mean, again, you take so many of the criticisms
So many really intelligent people are wasting their time doing really, really uninteresting things. Writing progress reports, coming up with modular budgets five years in advance of the science. I mean, again, you take so many of the criticisms
So many really intelligent people are wasting their time doing really, really uninteresting things. Writing progress reports, coming up with modular budgets five years in advance of the science. I mean, again, you take so many of the criticisms
described about the construction of affordable housing at DeHaanan, and you just change a few words here and there from funding source to public and public housing to, you know, R01 grants and checkboxes for scientific funding, and it's essentially the same story.
described about the construction of affordable housing at DeHaanan, and you just change a few words here and there from funding source to public and public housing to, you know, R01 grants and checkboxes for scientific funding, and it's essentially the same story.
described about the construction of affordable housing at DeHaanan, and you just change a few words here and there from funding source to public and public housing to, you know, R01 grants and checkboxes for scientific funding, and it's essentially the same story.