Dr. Bex

Maybe that is to make sure you've done X, Y, and Z, but that's not clearly delineated here. And we know specifically from other cases we've reviewed that it's going to the extreme. There's no timeline that makes sense. Like that, how in eight weeks a child has a GJ tube when they were a healthy baby eight weeks ago, like that timeline, there was not enough time to give things time to work.

Maybe that is to make sure you've done X, Y, and Z, but that's not clearly delineated here. And we know specifically from other cases we've reviewed that it's going to the extreme. There's no timeline that makes sense. Like that, how in eight weeks a child has a GJ tube when they were a healthy baby eight weeks ago, like that timeline, there was not enough time to give things time to work.

And so I think it's and it's just the extreme, the extremity of these things is just cannot be cannot be left unsaid.

And so I think it's and it's just the extreme, the extremity of these things is just cannot be cannot be left unsaid.

And so I think it's and it's just the extreme, the extremity of these things is just cannot be cannot be left unsaid.

So again, because of the way some of these things are being diagnosed, the idea is we're steering a little bit off of the standard of care for diagnosis, but then follow that up with steering off the standard of care for the treatment, even if the diagnosis was something that everyone agreed upon. So the diagnosis is made...

So again, because of the way some of these things are being diagnosed, the idea is we're steering a little bit off of the standard of care for diagnosis, but then follow that up with steering off the standard of care for the treatment, even if the diagnosis was something that everyone agreed upon. So the diagnosis is made...

So again, because of the way some of these things are being diagnosed, the idea is we're steering a little bit off of the standard of care for diagnosis, but then follow that up with steering off the standard of care for the treatment, even if the diagnosis was something that everyone agreed upon. So the diagnosis is made...

In these cases, it seems some of the ones that came up in the lawsuits based on what's called morphometrics. And the idea is basically measurements. And to be fair, there are things like, for instance, endocrinology is the most mathematical specialty we have. It's like if the glucose is this, you increase the insulin to this. It's a very like...

In these cases, it seems some of the ones that came up in the lawsuits based on what's called morphometrics. And the idea is basically measurements. And to be fair, there are things like, for instance, endocrinology is the most mathematical specialty we have. It's like if the glucose is this, you increase the insulin to this. It's a very like...

In these cases, it seems some of the ones that came up in the lawsuits based on what's called morphometrics. And the idea is basically measurements. And to be fair, there are things like, for instance, endocrinology is the most mathematical specialty we have. It's like if the glucose is this, you increase the insulin to this. It's a very like...

If then very objective, like if a doctor really likes that stuff, endocrine seems to be like a good fit for them. And then there are parts of medicine that aren't so clear cut. So what we want to do as physicians is we want to make it make sense. We want to make it objective. And so we try to find measurements, angles, things that everyone can agree upon that

If then very objective, like if a doctor really likes that stuff, endocrine seems to be like a good fit for them. And then there are parts of medicine that aren't so clear cut. So what we want to do as physicians is we want to make it make sense. We want to make it objective. And so we try to find measurements, angles, things that everyone can agree upon that

If then very objective, like if a doctor really likes that stuff, endocrine seems to be like a good fit for them. And then there are parts of medicine that aren't so clear cut. So what we want to do as physicians is we want to make it make sense. We want to make it objective. And so we try to find measurements, angles, things that everyone can agree upon that

The thing is, everyone, it's how you measure it too. So it's, are you on the exact middle image of the exact MRI on the exact slice that everybody is looking at? And if you put 20 radiologists, 20 neurosurgeons in the room, would they all get the same measurement?

The thing is, everyone, it's how you measure it too. So it's, are you on the exact middle image of the exact MRI on the exact slice that everybody is looking at? And if you put 20 radiologists, 20 neurosurgeons in the room, would they all get the same measurement?

The thing is, everyone, it's how you measure it too. So it's, are you on the exact middle image of the exact MRI on the exact slice that everybody is looking at? And if you put 20 radiologists, 20 neurosurgeons in the room, would they all get the same measurement?

Because technically, you could just shift to the next picture or the next picture, and it's going to make that angle or measurement look bigger or smaller. So it's still based on how the pictures were taken, the position the patient was in, who is doing the measuring. And again, if that person is not licensed at all, it even becomes more questionable.

Because technically, you could just shift to the next picture or the next picture, and it's going to make that angle or measurement look bigger or smaller. So it's still based on how the pictures were taken, the position the patient was in, who is doing the measuring. And again, if that person is not licensed at all, it even becomes more questionable.

Because technically, you could just shift to the next picture or the next picture, and it's going to make that angle or measurement look bigger or smaller. So it's still based on how the pictures were taken, the position the patient was in, who is doing the measuring. And again, if that person is not licensed at all, it even becomes more questionable.