Dr. Darryl Williams
speaker
108 appearances
2 recordings
1 series
first heard Jan 2025
last heard Mar 2025
Dr. Darryl Williams’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.
Trend
recordings per month · last 12 monthsNo recordings in the last 12 months.Older appearances are listed below; set an alert to hear about the next one.
Appearances
And so if they can solve the errors, which we've already done, I believe you're going to see the whole autonomous sciences just blossom.
Yeah, I think that I've seen many articles with Google and Meta and Amazon with the amount of money that they're spending. You're seeing open AI that is just increasing in value exponentially because there was no competitor. There was nothing else. So the fact that they weren't able to monetize their AI was irrelevant. They would just dump another 100 billion into it and hope for the best.
Hope was the course of action. What DeepSeat did I mean, it used a different learning. It used this reinforced learning. But ultimately, it was still garbage in, garbage out. The accuracy is at 88%, same as OpenAI or whatever else. But what it is, the cost is much less. So now, all of a sudden, there is a replacement. Before it was them or else.
Now you have this lower cost capability that because of its cost, you may be able to do some monetization. It shook the market. But ultimately, the market rebounded back just because it's the same thing. It's just a different name, but it's the same thing.
Yeah, the trends, I mean, I live through the bubble, the internet bubble. I don't believe that... these valuations and capitalizations that we're seeing can continue at this level. I mean, because ultimately there is going to come a day of reckoning that it's not monetizable because the accuracy is so bad. And then what happens with that? Does that sour everybody in the AI?
And so for me, the one trend is the negative trend is to look at just What is the development to rectify that? It just seems like it's all the lemmings heading for the cliff. But on the flip side for my trend is I am looking at the, it's almost proportional with the amount of capitalization, with the amount of frustration and angst.
What I'm looking at is as we are starting to permeate into those markets, we're starting to see more and more of the strategics, as we call them, start to have their awareness. but there is another solution. And that to me is the trend that I imagine seeing. You get enough strategics that are finally saying that what you're looking at over here is not reality. Look over here.
At that point there, I think you're going to see a turn in the market. I like to say we're ready for that turn, but I don't think that any one of us can understand what kind of volume that's going to be when finally people get frustrated enough to turn.
I think we're already there. I think that two years ago, or even a year ago, the news item that permeated the airwaves was the rebirth of Terminator and PsyNet and everyone else, that AI was going in that direction. And so we're seeing that.
My concern, as I've been talking with a lot of the senior leaders over in Europe, is the ethical implications of AI, where you have individuals which are saying, OK, so we have this capability. Ethically, do we pursue it?
And let me give you just a quick two-minute question that I give the ethics boards over in Europe, is that our system, let's say our system finds that a major nation that is petroleum-based Is existing, but we find that a country in Africa. Has a chemical as a as as a capability of supplanting petroleum based.
Economies are we should we ethically report that knowing that by doing that, that petroleum based economy collapses. Well, the answer is, well, no, you shouldn't do that. Well, should we then hold it so that this African country never thrives? Well, ethically, that's wrong. So the problem that most AI ethics are looking at is very linear.
The solution is that you have an AI capability that finds something that African country can now propel up to a first order. At the same time, you find a replacement for the petroleum-based economy that that country has. But no one's thinking along those lines. It's an on-off switch. Yes, no.
AI's got to be strong enough to do everything.
We have a website, www.partsoul.com. The software release is going to occur at the end of this month. After that, things are going to get extremely busy. But it's through forums like this, Scott, where the word gets out. And so just keep following us. Just remember that you heard this when all of a sudden things really start blowing out about third quarter.
Yeah, I won't say anything about that. But how much is invested? The United States has invested tremendous amounts in AI. I mean, you even saw with CNN and Fox this morning about the AI fighter jets, which are going to be hitting production. But once again, though, they are AI fighter jets.
but they're operating on an operating system that has 88% accuracy, which means that the human will never be out of the loop. And so there's a lot of investment going on right now, but it's still garbage in, garbage out. So we'll see if we can change that paradigm.
Thank you.
Absolutely. Thank you, Scott. As previously stated, I'm the founder and CEO and even the chief scientist of PartSol. It was a company that I created back in 2007. It was specifically looking at supply chain, at supply chain assurance. with the idea that everything in the world is indelibly linked to a supply chain.
We could talk about things like moving a widget from point A to point B, but in reality, everything is. A virus has a supply chain, an attack, a cyber attack has a supply chain, an individual has a supply chain. And once you're able to map those with a certain level of fidelity, then you're able to actually conduct predictive analytics. And so
Showing 61–80 of 108 · page 4 of 6
← Previous
Next →