Dr. Eric Haseltine

And so, for example, in Iran, you have the Iran group at the different agencies doing that now saying, okay, the Iranians have a nuclear program.

What is our best guess at what probability about where they are in that program and what their intent is?

Right?

So that's an example.

So with the UFOs, UAPs, we did the same.

We said, okay, here are the reporting.

What are all the different things that could be?

And now let's examine them.

So we have a matrix in there, which is a little bit geeky in that we present all of them that we surfaced.

And then we evaluate the plus or minus.

And at the end, we come up with a conclusion.

So we start with the observer themselves.

When you look at a phenomena, you have to look at what's reporting it and how accurate and biased is the thing that's reporting it.

So the human instrument, as a neuroscientist and as a physician, we can both tell you the human instrument is highly flawed, right?

And so we look at things like optical illusions, emotional bias that make you see what you want to see, that make you see what you expect to see.

We get into how your brain is wired to cut corners.

And so we explore optical illusions or other kind of illusions.

We explore atmospheric effects, some of which are just now being discovered, like sprites at southern latitudes, things really weird, ball lightning, things like that, plasma-type effects.

We explore the possibility that the mundane ones, like it's drones, balloons, things like that.

We explore the possibility that it's of human origin, highly classified and super high-tech effects.