Dr. Gabrielle Lyon

Period.

End of story.

Well, number one, it would be foolish for me to say no.

However, it would be difficult for me to say that there are areas that we are not testing and identifying.

When it comes to the influence of the environment, we know it's going to be the foods you eat.

We know it's going to be the exposures.

We know it's going to be either it's the sick building or your sick room or whatever it is that you're breathing in.

You know, from my perspective, the only untapped area would be the influence of technology.

But—

Again, that might be a foolish statement, but from my perspective, that is the one area that we have not really begun to explore for its health effects.

And I'm not even sure that we have a great language around it.

Right.

So we have ionizing radiation and non ionizing radiation.

So right now we believe that non ionizing radiation is is no problem, whether that's cell phones or, you know, Bluetooth, but radio waves.

But is that true?

And again, the data would suggest, you know, I had someone on my podcast, he's a physician, he's a radiation oncologist.

And he would say, no, radiation is, there's non-ionizing and then there's ionizing and non-ionizing is safe.

And is that true?

Or are we missing a whole influence on human health because of the way that we are surrounded by technology?

I mean, we are in a place where we've never been there before.