Dr. Jay Bhattacharya

Support for buildings, light bulbs to make sure that we can see in the lab, and a whole host of other important things. But there's a lot of distrust about where the money goes because the trust in the public health establishment has collapsed in the pandemic. I think transparency regarding indirect costs is absolutely worthwhile. And I want to make sure that the money goes to the research.

Support for buildings, light bulbs to make sure that we can see in the lab, and a whole host of other important things. But there's a lot of distrust about where the money goes because the trust in the public health establishment has collapsed in the pandemic. I think transparency regarding indirect costs is absolutely worthwhile. And I want to make sure that the money goes to the research.

Support for buildings, light bulbs to make sure that we can see in the lab, and a whole host of other important things. But there's a lot of distrust about where the money goes because the trust in the public health establishment has collapsed in the pandemic. I think transparency regarding indirect costs is absolutely worthwhile. And I want to make sure that the money goes to the research.

Yeah, I think there's this woman named Catherine Maher, I think is her name. She was the head of the Wikimedia Foundation, which was fundraising for Wikipedia. And then later, actually, she went over to NPR. She's like the CEO or something of NPR. Perfect. Her attitude toward the truth is absolutely shocking. Her basic idea is that there are many, many things that people disagree on.

Yeah, I think there's this woman named Catherine Maher, I think is her name. She was the head of the Wikimedia Foundation, which was fundraising for Wikipedia. And then later, actually, she went over to NPR. She's like the CEO or something of NPR. Perfect. Her attitude toward the truth is absolutely shocking. Her basic idea is that there are many, many things that people disagree on.

If our goal is to find the truth, we're never going to be able to get things done. So what we really need is something else. Uh, and I mean, it's one thing for a scientist to have an attitude like that. They probably won't be very good scientists. Like they'll fail the scientists, like scientists, uh, succeed because they have a burning desire to know the truth.

If our goal is to find the truth, we're never going to be able to get things done. So what we really need is something else. Uh, and I mean, it's one thing for a scientist to have an attitude like that. They probably won't be very good scientists. Like they'll fail the scientists, like scientists, uh, succeed because they have a burning desire to know the truth.

They change their minds when they see new data or whatnot. It's another thing to have people who run our, uh, the main encyclopedia of human knowledge or a public radio station where essentially what she's arguing for is propaganda.

They change their minds when they see new data or whatnot. It's another thing to have people who run our, uh, the main encyclopedia of human knowledge or a public radio station where essentially what she's arguing for is propaganda.

She's saying, look, we can show to you a facade that looks like the truth but isn't because it papers over the differences because we'll just exclude all the people that disagree. We'll slander all the people that disagree. I mean, I don't know if you've looked at My page in Wikipedia, it's pretty vandalized, and it's not anywhere close to an accurate representation of who I am or what I'm about.

She's saying, look, we can show to you a facade that looks like the truth but isn't because it papers over the differences because we'll just exclude all the people that disagree. We'll slander all the people that disagree. I mean, I don't know if you've looked at My page in Wikipedia, it's pretty vandalized, and it's not anywhere close to an accurate representation of who I am or what I'm about.

If that's her version of what is true and what's false, like the importance of the truth, well, then, I mean, I don't want any part of it.

If that's her version of what is true and what's false, like the importance of the truth, well, then, I mean, I don't want any part of it.

I mean, that book by Michael Sanger is really interesting. He wrote it quite early, actually. You know, in February of 2020, Tony Fauci sent his deputy, Cliff Lane, to go visit China. It was part of this WHO junket, essentially, to China that said, and the idea was like, let's go see what the Chinese did.

I mean, that book by Michael Sanger is really interesting. He wrote it quite early, actually. You know, in February of 2020, Tony Fauci sent his deputy, Cliff Lane, to go visit China. It was part of this WHO junket, essentially, to China that said, and the idea was like, let's go see what the Chinese did.

They came back home saying that what the Chinese did in January of 2020 with their draconian lockdowns had worked.

They came back home saying that what the Chinese did in January of 2020 with their draconian lockdowns had worked.

And there's this chilling email from Cliff Lane to Maria Vankirkov, the chief epidemiologist of the WHO, where it said, what the Chinese did worked, but albeit at great cost, it's going to take more than just the people in this room to decide if we want to do the same or something very close to that effect.

And there's this chilling email from Cliff Lane to Maria Vankirkov, the chief epidemiologist of the WHO, where it said, what the Chinese did worked, but albeit at great cost, it's going to take more than just the people in this room to decide if we want to do the same or something very close to that effect.

They were the top scientists, the top sort of public health officials of the world were absolutely fooled by the Chinese supposed conquering of COVID in 2020.