Dr. Jordan B. Peterson

We know that a tilt towards empathy, so agreeableness, trade agreeableness, a tilt, tilts you in a liberal direction and maybe in a progressive direction. And there are concomitants of being more agreeable on the personality side. But I think one of them is that The moderates that I've talked to always denied the existence of the pathological radicals on the left.

We know that a tilt towards empathy, so agreeableness, trade agreeableness, a tilt, tilts you in a liberal direction and maybe in a progressive direction. And there are concomitants of being more agreeable on the personality side. But I think one of them is that The moderates that I've talked to always denied the existence of the pathological radicals on the left.

We know that a tilt towards empathy, so agreeableness, trade agreeableness, a tilt, tilts you in a liberal direction and maybe in a progressive direction. And there are concomitants of being more agreeable on the personality side. But I think one of them is that The moderates that I've talked to always denied the existence of the pathological radicals on the left.

And I've really thought, I mean, this is to a man or woman. Yeah, yeah. And I think what it is, I think it has something to do with the unwillingness or inability of the more liberal types to have imagination for evil. Like, I would make the case that most criminals You could validly interpret most criminals whose criminal history is sporadic and short as victims.

And I've really thought, I mean, this is to a man or woman. Yeah, yeah. And I think what it is, I think it has something to do with the unwillingness or inability of the more liberal types to have imagination for evil. Like, I would make the case that most criminals You could validly interpret most criminals whose criminal history is sporadic and short as victims.

And I've really thought, I mean, this is to a man or woman. Yeah, yeah. And I think what it is, I think it has something to do with the unwillingness or inability of the more liberal types to have imagination for evil. Like, I would make the case that most criminals You could validly interpret most criminals whose criminal history is sporadic and short as victims.

They've come from abusive families, alcoholic families, often multi-generationally antisocial families, etc. But there's a subset of criminals. It's 1% of the criminals, 65% of the crimes. There's a subset of criminals who are not victims. They are really monsters. And I don't think there's any imagination for the monstrous among the compassionate left, it's all victims.

They've come from abusive families, alcoholic families, often multi-generationally antisocial families, etc. But there's a subset of criminals. It's 1% of the criminals, 65% of the crimes. There's a subset of criminals who are not victims. They are really monsters. And I don't think there's any imagination for the monstrous among the compassionate left, it's all victims.

They've come from abusive families, alcoholic families, often multi-generationally antisocial families, etc. But there's a subset of criminals. It's 1% of the criminals, 65% of the crimes. There's a subset of criminals who are not victims. They are really monsters. And I don't think there's any imagination for the monstrous among the compassionate left, it's all victims.

It doesn't matter how egregious the crime. Now, that's something I would have tested as a social psychologist if I still had an active research lab, which I don't. But the problem with what we know that we know from simulations that networks of cooperators can establish themselves in a way that's mutually beneficial and productive. But that if a shark is dropped into a tank of cooperators,

It doesn't matter how egregious the crime. Now, that's something I would have tested as a social psychologist if I still had an active research lab, which I don't. But the problem with what we know that we know from simulations that networks of cooperators can establish themselves in a way that's mutually beneficial and productive. But that if a shark is dropped into a tank of cooperators,

It doesn't matter how egregious the crime. Now, that's something I would have tested as a social psychologist if I still had an active research lab, which I don't. But the problem with what we know that we know from simulations that networks of cooperators can establish themselves in a way that's mutually beneficial and productive. But that if a shark is dropped into a tank of cooperators,

then the shark takes everything. So the problem with being agreeable and cooperative is that the monsters can get you. And if you're temperamentally tilted towards denying the existence of the monster so much the worse. Now, I made that case because you talked about the relationship between narcissism and left-wing authoritarianism. I mean, narcissism shades into sadism as well.

then the shark takes everything. So the problem with being agreeable and cooperative is that the monsters can get you. And if you're temperamentally tilted towards denying the existence of the monster so much the worse. Now, I made that case because you talked about the relationship between narcissism and left-wing authoritarianism. I mean, narcissism shades into sadism as well.

then the shark takes everything. So the problem with being agreeable and cooperative is that the monsters can get you. And if you're temperamentally tilted towards denying the existence of the monster so much the worse. Now, I made that case because you talked about the relationship between narcissism and left-wing authoritarianism. I mean, narcissism shades into sadism as well.

And so this is a very big problem, especially with online denunciation. Okay, so back to 2022. Now there's... debate about whether these papers are going to proceed to publication. Right, they were... And there's allegations made against the people who wrote the reviews.

And so this is a very big problem, especially with online denunciation. Okay, so back to 2022. Now there's... debate about whether these papers are going to proceed to publication. Right, they were... And there's allegations made against the people who wrote the reviews.

And so this is a very big problem, especially with online denunciation. Okay, so back to 2022. Now there's... debate about whether these papers are going to proceed to publication. Right, they were... And there's allegations made against the people who wrote the reviews.

So why did Smith have such an outsized say in all this? Like, that isn't how the scientific process generally works. So they once... APS...

So why did Smith have such an outsized say in all this? Like, that isn't how the scientific process generally works. So they once... APS...