Dr. Matthew Hill

So I think that's more typically in a lab setting, how you would define if someone's high or not from it. And this is why when people do studies with something like a placebo cannabis or a very low THC cannabis, you'll see kind of a scaling. So, um,

So I think that's more typically in a lab setting, how you would define if someone's high or not from it. And this is why when people do studies with something like a placebo cannabis or a very low THC cannabis, you'll see kind of a scaling. So, um,

So I think that's more typically in a lab setting, how you would define if someone's high or not from it. And this is why when people do studies with something like a placebo cannabis or a very low THC cannabis, you'll see kind of a scaling. So, um,

Even if you give someone a placebo cannabis, if they think that they're getting cannabis, a lot of people still respond by saying they feel a bit high.

Even if you give someone a placebo cannabis, if they think that they're getting cannabis, a lot of people still respond by saying they feel a bit high.

Even if you give someone a placebo cannabis, if they think that they're getting cannabis, a lot of people still respond by saying they feel a bit high.

I'm not actually certain if you are allowed to have someone in a drug study if they've never done something before. I think they have to have had some previous experience with a drug to be enrolled.

I'm not actually certain if you are allowed to have someone in a drug study if they've never done something before. I think they have to have had some previous experience with a drug to be enrolled.

I'm not actually certain if you are allowed to have someone in a drug study if they've never done something before. I think they have to have had some previous experience with a drug to be enrolled.

Yeah, but I think, yeah, I don't think you can use drug-naive people. I mean, I don't run human clinical lab studies, so I can't explicitly say it, but that's my understanding is that someone has to have had even limited, like, not much, but at least once or twice. They have to have experienced the drug before.

Yeah, but I think, yeah, I don't think you can use drug-naive people. I mean, I don't run human clinical lab studies, so I can't explicitly say it, but that's my understanding is that someone has to have had even limited, like, not much, but at least once or twice. They have to have experienced the drug before.

Yeah, but I think, yeah, I don't think you can use drug-naive people. I mean, I don't run human clinical lab studies, so I can't explicitly say it, but that's my understanding is that someone has to have had even limited, like, not much, but at least once or twice. They have to have experienced the drug before.

So I don't know if you would take someone who was completely blind because I don't know how they would replicate that state if they're not expecting it.

So I don't know if you would take someone who was completely blind because I don't know how they would replicate that state if they're not expecting it.

So I don't know if you would take someone who was completely blind because I don't know how they would replicate that state if they're not expecting it.

I wouldn't say it's well worked out. There definitely seems to be some like temporal dilation, like you're saying, where people think things of, you know, someone will be high and someone will ask them, how long do you think time has passed? They would report usually longer periods of time have passed than actually have.

I wouldn't say it's well worked out. There definitely seems to be some like temporal dilation, like you're saying, where people think things of, you know, someone will be high and someone will ask them, how long do you think time has passed? They would report usually longer periods of time have passed than actually have.

I wouldn't say it's well worked out. There definitely seems to be some like temporal dilation, like you're saying, where people think things of, you know, someone will be high and someone will ask them, how long do you think time has passed? They would report usually longer periods of time have passed than actually have.

I feel like there is some older work I could dig up to see if I could find that is either in like, it might even be in pigeons, but it might be in rodents that's looking at like temporal ordering and they give animals cannabinoids. And that's kind of a cleaner way of seeing because they are very good at learning. Like if I wait 10 minutes and then I engage in a behavior, I get a reward.

I feel like there is some older work I could dig up to see if I could find that is either in like, it might even be in pigeons, but it might be in rodents that's looking at like temporal ordering and they give animals cannabinoids. And that's kind of a cleaner way of seeing because they are very good at learning. Like if I wait 10 minutes and then I engage in a behavior, I get a reward.