Ed Dowd
speaker
80 appearances
1 recordings
1 series
first heard Dec 2024
last heard Dec 2024
Ed Dowd’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.
Trend
recordings per month · last 12 monthsNo recordings in the last 12 months.Older appearances are listed below; set an alert to hear about the next one.
Appearances
It says that there's a category of people called injured who are constantly sick and missing work. And if you look at the Pfizer clinical trials, There were 18% more adverse events, SAEs, serious adverse events in the vaccine arm versus the placebo arm. So just based on that alone, it should have failed the safety trial, but they pushed it through.
I mean, you know how the FDA worked in the old days. Forget they failed the all-cause mortality endpoint where there were 23% more deaths in the vaccine arm. They failed the safety tests. There were 18% more SAEs. And this is a joke. I mean, I don't even know why. I'm still just befuddled why we're still here talking about this.
It's one of the greatest psyops and psychological operations I've ever seen. And first of all, it's not a vaccine. It's a therapeutic. And they called it a vaccine so they could get it under the EUA. We're living in bizarro land where there's so much fraud in our healthcare system, fraud in the government, fraud in the economic statistics they're putting out.
It's literally the golden age of fraud in my mind.
Let's talk about that for a second. A critic came out recently against RFK, Scott Gottlieb, the former head of the FDA under Trump, who then parachuted into being a board member of Pfizer. and became basically the spokesperson for Pfizer all over the financial news media. He got free advertising going on CNBC all the time.
And he just came out and said that Bobby Kennedy will be bad for Americans' health. And I look at that, and it makes me sick to my stomach. That guy profited from the vaccines and his nonsense lies about how efficacious it was and safe.
In VAERS, I believe it's 30,000 globally, and I think maybe 16,000 in the U.S. And if you look at the underreporting factor and multiply it, you take 20, use a number of 20 or 41. I think 41 was the one calculated using the CDC's methods. You get close to the number that we have, that we've calculated, 1.2 million Americans perished between 21 and 23.
That was corroborated, mind you, by another economist slash business consultant, ethical skeptic on Twitter, who's anonymous, but he does separate work, different methodology, and we corroborate each other all the time. So we're not in cahoots. We just put out our results and our results corroborate each other. And I also want to note, Peter Hotez,
came out recently in an interview and said that he saw a study that the vaccine saved lives, about 3 million, because even though 1.2 million Americans died after the vaccine, now, I find that interesting because that's exactly the number that myself, an ethical skeptic, have come up with. So they're now admitting 1.2 million Americans did die excessively since the vaccine rollout.
But don't worry about it because more people would have died without the vaccine and they pull some mythical, magical, statistical garbage out of their butt.
Well, we're going to update 2024 numbers for all our studies. And then we've got a liver paper coming out, a muscular skeletal skin paper coming out. And, you know, we're just going to continue to monitor what's going on. And the disability number comes out this Friday, along with the non-reform payroll. So I'm very eager to see what direction it's going.
And it's close to a new all-time high again. So we'll see if we go to a new all-time high on Friday.
Yeah, liver deaths and skin issues, skin deaths, musculoskeletal deaths. On the liver, there definitely was an effect in the older people that we can attribute most likely to the vaccine. It's more money in the younger age, folks, because there was an increase in alcohol consumption during the lockdown. But if you parse the data, we can tease out a signal.
We're going to put the data as it stands and let the chips fall where they may.
The report's not finished. I haven't seen it yet. My partners are working on it, so I don't want to conclude anything right now.
Well, there's two things. There's the stated GDP numbers and establishment non-farm payroll survey, and there's economic reality. Trump got elected in primarily Bobby Kennedy and Elon and everyone who contributed helped, but Trump primarily got elected because of the economy. And In 1980, Ronald Reagan had a real average wage earning growth at minus 2%. He got swept into office.
In 1992, minus 2% for Bill Clinton, and James Carville said, is the economy stupid? And by the way, those two numbers were associated with recessions. Trump, prior to the election, had a minus 2% number. No recession, oddly enough, but I believe one's coming when the truth is revealed.
The government has been spending for the last two years crisis-like deficit spending, meaning in the great financial crisis, we had 10% deficits to GDP. We're at 8% right now. What's the crisis? The crisis was to get Biden or Harris reelected and retain power. That was their crisis.
And they basically, in my estimation, and I've talked to economists offline who won't say this publicly, but they agree with me, they've cooked the books. The non-farm payroll numbers are statistical lies. You've got to remember, when they come out with a number on Friday, it's an estimate, but then it's followed up with real data later.
They keep putting out these fake numbers, then they get revised down. In August, we had a revision of 850,000 jobs down. We have the private sector, every indication of the private sector is that it's contracting. So what did they do? They opened the floodgates for immigrants, gave them STEMIs that helped juice the economy short term. That's part of the deficit.
Showing 41–60 of 80 · page 3 of 4
← Previous
Next →