Ed Gamble

Carey's brilliant.

Just the gameplay of that.

is and to have Boland nagging away and the keeper standing up behind it chuntering away that's yeah that's all that's all part of the game but no I think Jack can consider himself very unlucky he really didn't do a lot wrong it was just the brilliance of Kerry that got him out I mean not many of them did do a lot wrong and I'm afraid this is the moment when we're going to have to go into Snicko world because Snicko really tightly head again I don't want to talk too much about it because we did it yesterday

At least we thought it was... We think it shows an edge.

The big difference, Dan, is that the ones that we're used to at home...

and an ICC cricket, which is supplied by Hawkeye, give you a proper jag, bang, bang.

There is no doubt that that is an edge.

Part of the problem here is you get a sort of a smudge sometimes.

Other times you get a jag, the one that Cummins got to into his thigh pad.

Nice big jag.

Thanks very much indeed.

So therefore, if there's a jag for that time, why isn't it a big jaggedy one for the other times instead of a mush?

There's something wrong with it.

It's...

My own thought is that the ICC makes absolute fortune out of all sorts of aspects of the game.

It should be supplying the best quality DRS.

It insists on DRS because the problem is, like here and like everywhere, it's the host television company that provide the system.

Now, the host television company is probably paid millions and millions of dollars anyway just for the rights to broadcast it.

they're going to look to cut a few corners somewhere.

You get two quotes to supply the DRS, and you think, well, they're charging so much, but they're charging 20% more.