Elaad Eliyahu

There's a fine line in how they define it, but targeted harassment.

And this absolutely qualifies, and I will tell you from experience, on the shows that we've had polled, because people had said something as silly as like...

Man, I can't stand that guy.

I wish somebody would go there and, you know, teach him a lesson.

But I'm maybe a little bit more egregious.

But something like, oh, won't someone rid me of this meddlesome priest?

And then YouTube's like, you can't do that.

YouTube once came in and deleted all of the chat and locked it.

Because of something someone in the chat wrote that was about like not liking politicians or it was something it was a letter that Thomas Jefferson had written that I'm not going to state because they'll take the showdown for it.

So so ultimately, the point is this.

YouTube is aware of what she's saying.

She knows they know she's being sued for it and they know that she still says it all the time.

And they are like, no, no, that's fine.

You and I will profit together off of these things we know you're being sued for.

The argument now is there's a big difference between you can say whatever you want and we know what you're saying is defamatory.

You're being sued for it, but we're going to make money together anyway.

We're going to generate revenue for you for doing it.

Unless it's defamation per se.

In this case, it is.

I think YouTube to step in and- Well, she's being sued, and then she tried to get it dismissed and failed.