Elaad Eliyahu

She's going up against a head of state who has, like, the way I describe it is this.

People think in law, what's written down is the most important thing, and that's never true.

In law, what matters is, does someone have power?

And Donald Trump has to negotiate with the McCrones in NATO and the EU.

And the McCrones don't like what she's saying.

And you can call this tyranny, you can call it corruption, that's fine.

The fact of the matter is, if you think Candace Owens, as a private citizen, will win against a head of state, you're nuts.

Unless, of course, she's in on it.

Maybe, I don't know.

Defamation per se is defamation that's considered so egregious.

And it doesn't require.

Right, right.

Do you believe that YouTube...

has not considered what Candace is doing.

I would argue that internally at YouTube, it is a one-of-one chance that YouTube execs came together over text and in a meeting to discuss what she was saying and potential legal liability because she's saying it.

When the McCrones filed a suit and got involved, I'm willing to bet 100% YouTube legal said, this is becoming an international issue.

What's our risk here?

Are they a party to the lawsuit?

No.

And that's the point is not my point is not about Candace Owens.