Elena
๐ค PersonAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
And then Brennan takes Sosogra down several paths about different assumptions that he might have made when doing the analysis. Like, for example, what if he incorrectly assumed that some of the phone call logs used for the syncing were between the Lexus call system and an iPhone instead of between just two iPhones?
And the conclusion here is that yes, if there were incorrect assumptions made, or if there were errors in the dataset, the dataset that was made by the prosecution's experts, by the way, then yes, then some of the 30 variance values should be excluded from that list of possibilities.
And the conclusion here is that yes, if there were incorrect assumptions made, or if there were errors in the dataset, the dataset that was made by the prosecution's experts, by the way, then yes, then some of the 30 variance values should be excluded from that list of possibilities.
And the conclusion here is that yes, if there were incorrect assumptions made, or if there were errors in the dataset, the dataset that was made by the prosecution's experts, by the way, then yes, then some of the 30 variance values should be excluded from that list of possibilities.
But it doesn't change the overall conclusion that the vast majority of these possible clock sync values do show John's phone being used after the backup maneuver. Now, despite what the prosecution established during Cross, I do want to point something out about DeSogra that I think could make his testimony go far in the minds of the jury.
But it doesn't change the overall conclusion that the vast majority of these possible clock sync values do show John's phone being used after the backup maneuver. Now, despite what the prosecution established during Cross, I do want to point something out about DeSogra that I think could make his testimony go far in the minds of the jury.
But it doesn't change the overall conclusion that the vast majority of these possible clock sync values do show John's phone being used after the backup maneuver. Now, despite what the prosecution established during Cross, I do want to point something out about DeSogra that I think could make his testimony go far in the minds of the jury.
Something that's completely separate from credibility, separate from how many degrees someone has, all that stuff. And that's understandability. Now, I think that compared to Welcher and Burgess, DeSogre's testimony was much more digestible to a non-expert, to a regular person on the jury. His slides were cleaner, his answers were shorter and more straightforward.
Something that's completely separate from credibility, separate from how many degrees someone has, all that stuff. And that's understandability. Now, I think that compared to Welcher and Burgess, DeSogre's testimony was much more digestible to a non-expert, to a regular person on the jury. His slides were cleaner, his answers were shorter and more straightforward.
Something that's completely separate from credibility, separate from how many degrees someone has, all that stuff. And that's understandability. Now, I think that compared to Welcher and Burgess, DeSogre's testimony was much more digestible to a non-expert, to a regular person on the jury. His slides were cleaner, his answers were shorter and more straightforward.
And I do think the defense had a good way of asking questions in a way that, you know, there was a line of logic to follow. And I think that understandability, digestibility, things like that, those are really powerful tools in a case that's this complicated.
And I do think the defense had a good way of asking questions in a way that, you know, there was a line of logic to follow. And I think that understandability, digestibility, things like that, those are really powerful tools in a case that's this complicated.
And I do think the defense had a good way of asking questions in a way that, you know, there was a line of logic to follow. And I think that understandability, digestibility, things like that, those are really powerful tools in a case that's this complicated.
I think even if you lean towards the prosecution, even if you don't like what DeSogra has to say, if he can say it in a way that makes sense, that's clean, that's straightforward, I think that can go far.
I think even if you lean towards the prosecution, even if you don't like what DeSogra has to say, if he can say it in a way that makes sense, that's clean, that's straightforward, I think that can go far.
I think even if you lean towards the prosecution, even if you don't like what DeSogra has to say, if he can say it in a way that makes sense, that's clean, that's straightforward, I think that can go far.
Then at the end of the day, we heard brief arguments from the lawyers outside of the jury's presence about whether Michael Proctor's friend should be called as a witness so that the defense can introduce into evidence those text messages that Proctor sent to his friends about the case without actually calling Proctor himself. But we don't know the judge's ruling on this issue quite yet.
Then at the end of the day, we heard brief arguments from the lawyers outside of the jury's presence about whether Michael Proctor's friend should be called as a witness so that the defense can introduce into evidence those text messages that Proctor sent to his friends about the case without actually calling Proctor himself. But we don't know the judge's ruling on this issue quite yet.
Then at the end of the day, we heard brief arguments from the lawyers outside of the jury's presence about whether Michael Proctor's friend should be called as a witness so that the defense can introduce into evidence those text messages that Proctor sent to his friends about the case without actually calling Proctor himself. But we don't know the judge's ruling on this issue quite yet.
Now, the defense is set to continue first thing on Monday morning. And remember, the defense is only expected for their case to last about a week or two. And that's actually not uncommon. It doesn't mean that the defense doesn't have a strong case. For example, Casey Anthony's team only had about six days of testimony for the defense compared to 18 days from the prosecution.