Elena

On cross-examination, Clark testified that he didn't photograph the car until February 1st, and he admitted that he didn't know how much access Michael Proctor could have had to the car before he arrived. And on a different note, Clark also said that he and Proctor interviewed Colin Albert together. Now, that's the nephew of the homeowner, Brian Albert.

And when the defense pointed out that Colin wasn't interviewed until a year and a half after the incident, Clark couldn't really explain why they had waited so long. Another state police sergeant was on the stand next.

And when the defense pointed out that Colin wasn't interviewed until a year and a half after the incident, Clark couldn't really explain why they had waited so long. Another state police sergeant was on the stand next.

And when the defense pointed out that Colin wasn't interviewed until a year and a half after the incident, Clark couldn't really explain why they had waited so long. Another state police sergeant was on the stand next.

This was Evan Brent, who photographed some of the evidence that was recovered from the lawn of 34 Fairview on February 3rd, and he also went to One Meadows and photographed John's car in the driveway.

This was Evan Brent, who photographed some of the evidence that was recovered from the lawn of 34 Fairview on February 3rd, and he also went to One Meadows and photographed John's car in the driveway.

This was Evan Brent, who photographed some of the evidence that was recovered from the lawn of 34 Fairview on February 3rd, and he also went to One Meadows and photographed John's car in the driveway.

Now, he testified that he didn't observe any damage to John's car, which is in line with Buchanick's testimony, but it doesn't really answer the main question of, well, was there damage to Karen's car? Because of course it's possible for one car to be damaged, but not the other if there is an accident.

Now, he testified that he didn't observe any damage to John's car, which is in line with Buchanick's testimony, but it doesn't really answer the main question of, well, was there damage to Karen's car? Because of course it's possible for one car to be damaged, but not the other if there is an accident.

Now, he testified that he didn't observe any damage to John's car, which is in line with Buchanick's testimony, but it doesn't really answer the main question of, well, was there damage to Karen's car? Because of course it's possible for one car to be damaged, but not the other if there is an accident.

Now, just like with Clark, the main point that the defense established during Brent's cross-examination was that he wasn't involved in the case until February, and he had no knowledge of who could have had access to the car or to the crime scene before then.

Now, just like with Clark, the main point that the defense established during Brent's cross-examination was that he wasn't involved in the case until February, and he had no knowledge of who could have had access to the car or to the crime scene before then.

Now, just like with Clark, the main point that the defense established during Brent's cross-examination was that he wasn't involved in the case until February, and he had no knowledge of who could have had access to the car or to the crime scene before then.

Again, showing that there's, at the very least, some opportunity for Proctor to get his hands on everything before everyone else became involved. Sergeant Brian Gallarini briefly took the stand next, and he testified to taking DNA samples from Sergeant Pukenik and former trooper Michael Proctor.

Again, showing that there's, at the very least, some opportunity for Proctor to get his hands on everything before everyone else became involved. Sergeant Brian Gallarini briefly took the stand next, and he testified to taking DNA samples from Sergeant Pukenik and former trooper Michael Proctor.

Again, showing that there's, at the very least, some opportunity for Proctor to get his hands on everything before everyone else became involved. Sergeant Brian Gallarini briefly took the stand next, and he testified to taking DNA samples from Sergeant Pukenik and former trooper Michael Proctor.

Then lastly on Wednesday, we heard from Maureen Hartnett from the State Police Crime Lab, who processed a lot of the evidence at the scene. Now I gotta say, I liked Hartnett. She came off as being reliable, and she talked about being very meticulous, very by the book when it came to handling the evidence. In fact, maybe she could teach Mr. Leafblower Gallagher a thing or two about evidence.

Then lastly on Wednesday, we heard from Maureen Hartnett from the State Police Crime Lab, who processed a lot of the evidence at the scene. Now I gotta say, I liked Hartnett. She came off as being reliable, and she talked about being very meticulous, very by the book when it came to handling the evidence. In fact, maybe she could teach Mr. Leafblower Gallagher a thing or two about evidence.

Then lastly on Wednesday, we heard from Maureen Hartnett from the State Police Crime Lab, who processed a lot of the evidence at the scene. Now I gotta say, I liked Hartnett. She came off as being reliable, and she talked about being very meticulous, very by the book when it came to handling the evidence. In fact, maybe she could teach Mr. Leafblower Gallagher a thing or two about evidence.

But even so, I think her analysis can only be as good as the evidence she's given. And in this case, a lot of the evidence is questionable at best. For example, she had to swab the blood that was in those good ol' reliable red Solo cups. And she testified that she's never before or since seen evidence collected in cups like that.