Elena

He first got Barrows to admit that he didn't actually see either Proctor or Buchanick actually touch or damage the taillight in any sort of way. Although I will say that doesn't necessarily disprove anything, because the defense is saying that they manipulated it or broke it or whatever at or on the way to Canton PD, not there in Dighton in the driveway.

He first got Barrows to admit that he didn't actually see either Proctor or Buchanick actually touch or damage the taillight in any sort of way. Although I will say that doesn't necessarily disprove anything, because the defense is saying that they manipulated it or broke it or whatever at or on the way to Canton PD, not there in Dighton in the driveway.

And Brennan also pointed out that Barros didn't really name the specifics of the damage to Karen's taillight in his report. He said that it had damage, but he didn't write anything about the size or the extent or the specific location of where the damage was. So it is a little bit hard to know for sure exactly what he saw.

And Brennan also pointed out that Barros didn't really name the specifics of the damage to Karen's taillight in his report. He said that it had damage, but he didn't write anything about the size or the extent or the specific location of where the damage was. So it is a little bit hard to know for sure exactly what he saw.

And Brennan also pointed out that Barros didn't really name the specifics of the damage to Karen's taillight in his report. He said that it had damage, but he didn't write anything about the size or the extent or the specific location of where the damage was. So it is a little bit hard to know for sure exactly what he saw.

And Barros also admitted that his testimony has changed a bit since the last time he testified. Like I said, in the last trial, Barros was actually called by the prosecution. And at that time, he didn't testify to any difference between his observations in Cairns Driveway and in Canton PD. So of course, as we've said, changing your testimony, it never looks good.

And Barros also admitted that his testimony has changed a bit since the last time he testified. Like I said, in the last trial, Barros was actually called by the prosecution. And at that time, he didn't testify to any difference between his observations in Cairns Driveway and in Canton PD. So of course, as we've said, changing your testimony, it never looks good.

And Barros also admitted that his testimony has changed a bit since the last time he testified. Like I said, in the last trial, Barros was actually called by the prosecution. And at that time, he didn't testify to any difference between his observations in Cairns Driveway and in Canton PD. So of course, as we've said, changing your testimony, it never looks good.

Whether it's because someone genuinely forgets what happened, or they lied the first time, or they've been paid off so now they're going to lie the second time. Whatever it is, it's not a good look. I get it.

Whether it's because someone genuinely forgets what happened, or they lied the first time, or they've been paid off so now they're going to lie the second time. Whatever it is, it's not a good look. I get it.

Whether it's because someone genuinely forgets what happened, or they lied the first time, or they've been paid off so now they're going to lie the second time. Whatever it is, it's not a good look. I get it.

But what I want to point out is that unlike a lot of the other witnesses who have changed their testimony in this case, Barros doesn't really stand to gain anything for changing his testimony besides maybe a clean conscience. Remember, he's employed as a police sergeant in Dayton, just 30 miles away from Canton. And in some ways, he's probably putting his livelihood on the line here.

But what I want to point out is that unlike a lot of the other witnesses who have changed their testimony in this case, Barros doesn't really stand to gain anything for changing his testimony besides maybe a clean conscience. Remember, he's employed as a police sergeant in Dayton, just 30 miles away from Canton. And in some ways, he's probably putting his livelihood on the line here.

But what I want to point out is that unlike a lot of the other witnesses who have changed their testimony in this case, Barros doesn't really stand to gain anything for changing his testimony besides maybe a clean conscience. Remember, he's employed as a police sergeant in Dayton, just 30 miles away from Canton. And in some ways, he's probably putting his livelihood on the line here.

And what does he really gain in return? It's not like he's paid one of these giant lump sums like the expert witnesses are or anything like that. So in my opinion, he has nothing to gain and everything to lose by speaking out. And yet he did it anyway, and that's what makes me believe him. Then on Wednesday, we moved on to another really important witness for the defense.

And what does he really gain in return? It's not like he's paid one of these giant lump sums like the expert witnesses are or anything like that. So in my opinion, he has nothing to gain and everything to lose by speaking out. And yet he did it anyway, and that's what makes me believe him. Then on Wednesday, we moved on to another really important witness for the defense.

And what does he really gain in return? It's not like he's paid one of these giant lump sums like the expert witnesses are or anything like that. So in my opinion, he has nothing to gain and everything to lose by speaking out. And yet he did it anyway, and that's what makes me believe him. Then on Wednesday, we moved on to another really important witness for the defense.

This was Brian Loughran, who goes by the nickname Lucky. Lucky was working as a snowplow driver in the early morning hours of John's death. And during that time, he plowed past 34 Fairview several times. He said on his initial passes, which were between about 2.40 a.m. and 3 a.m., he said he had a clear view of the entire lawn and that flagpole area, and he saw absolutely nothing.

This was Brian Loughran, who goes by the nickname Lucky. Lucky was working as a snowplow driver in the early morning hours of John's death. And during that time, he plowed past 34 Fairview several times. He said on his initial passes, which were between about 2.40 a.m. and 3 a.m., he said he had a clear view of the entire lawn and that flagpole area, and he saw absolutely nothing.

This was Brian Loughran, who goes by the nickname Lucky. Lucky was working as a snowplow driver in the early morning hours of John's death. And during that time, he plowed past 34 Fairview several times. He said on his initial passes, which were between about 2.40 a.m. and 3 a.m., he said he had a clear view of the entire lawn and that flagpole area, and he saw absolutely nothing.