Menu
Sign In Search Podcasts Charts People & Topics Add Podcast API Blog Pricing

Eliezer Yudkowsky

๐Ÿ‘ค Speaker
See mentions of this person in podcasts
1713 total appearances

Appearances Over Time

Podcast Appearances

Rationality: From AI to Zombies
Argument Screens Off Authority

The rest you can take on my personal authority or look up in the references.

Rationality: From AI to Zombies
Argument Screens Off Authority

If the probability of H given E1 equals 90% and the probability of H given E2 is 9%, what is the probability of H given E1 and E2?

Rationality: From AI to Zombies
Argument Screens Off Authority

If learning E1 is true leads us to assign 90% probability to H, and learning E2 is true leads us to assign 9% probability to H, then what probability should we assign to H if we learn both E1 and E2?

Rationality: From AI to Zombies
Argument Screens Off Authority

This is simply not something you can calculate in probability theory from the information given.

Rationality: From AI to Zombies
Argument Screens Off Authority

No, the missing information is not the prior probability of H. E1 and E2 may not be independent of each other.

Rationality: From AI to Zombies
Argument Screens Off Authority

Suppose that H is my sidewalk is slippery, E1 is my sprinkler is running, and E2 is it's night.

Rationality: From AI to Zombies
Argument Screens Off Authority

The sidewalk is slippery starting from one minute after the sprinkler starts until just after the sprinkler finishes, and the sprinkler runs for 10 minutes.

Rationality: From AI to Zombies
Argument Screens Off Authority

So if we know the sprinkler is on, the probability is 90% that the sidewalk is slippery.

Rationality: From AI to Zombies
Argument Screens Off Authority

The sprinkler is on during 10% of the nighttime, so if we know that it's night, the probability of the sidewalk being slippery is 9%.

Rationality: From AI to Zombies
Argument Screens Off Authority

If we know that it's night and the sprinkler is on, that is, if we know both facts, the probability of the sidewalk being slippery is 90%.

Rationality: From AI to Zombies
Argument Screens Off Authority

We can represent this in a graphical model as follows.

Rationality: From AI to Zombies
Argument Screens Off Authority

Here, the author has the word night, followed by an arrow pointing to the right, followed by a sprinkler, followed by a second arrow pointing to the right, followed by slippery.

Rationality: From AI to Zombies
Argument Screens Off Authority

That's night, arrow to sprinkler, arrow to slippery.

Rationality: From AI to Zombies
Argument Screens Off Authority

Whether or not it's night causes the sprinkler to be on or off, and whether the sprinkler is on causes the sidewalk to be slippery or unslippery.

Rationality: From AI to Zombies
Argument Screens Off Authority

The direction of the arrows is meaningful.

Rationality: From AI to Zombies
Argument Screens Off Authority

If I wrote night arrow to sprinkler arrow from slippery back to sprinkler, that's the word night followed by an arrow pointing to the right followed by sprinkler followed by an arrow pointing to the left followed by slippery,

Rationality: From AI to Zombies
Argument Screens Off Authority

This would mean that if I didn't know anything about the sprinkler, the probability of nighttime and slipperiness would be independent of each other.

Rationality: From AI to Zombies
Argument Screens Off Authority

For example, suppose that I roll die one and die two and add up the showing numbers to get the sum.

Rationality: From AI to Zombies
Argument Screens Off Authority

Graphically, I would represent that as die 1, arrow to the right, sum, arrow to the left, die 2.

Rationality: From AI to Zombies
Argument Screens Off Authority

That's the word sum in between the words die 1 and die 2, both with arrows pointing towards the word sum.