Emily Glazer

It doesn't really make sense.

And I think this goes much further than ultra-wealthy people casually sharing tips about something at a cocktail party or at the golf course because both with the volume of the information he was getting and the way that he acted on it.

Now, don't get me wrong.

He also had access to opportunities via hedge funds or venture capital firms and would make money from those.

We saw that in the files.

That's a little bit more normal among the ultra-wealthy.

This takes it much further.

I think that we have a deeper understanding of how many ways he entangled himself into other people's lives, and not just with the sexual exploits, but also on the business side, even if he wasn't officially devising them.

It shows that he also was doing things to like personally benefit himself and his own wealth, and that he was constantly trading information.

people shared an unbelievable amount of information with Jeffrey Epstein.

And it doesn't totally make sense how he was such a repository for so much confidential information to the point that his email signature, Ryan, literally said, the contents of this message may constitute inside information.

It's usually when it's a lawyer.

And Jeffrey Epstein was not a lawyer.

If I told you, then all of my competitors would know, too.

I will just say that I am not done searching through these files.

We're aware of dozens of billionaires that were in this signal chat called Save California.

And they were complaining about the proposed tax.

They were trying to suggest alternatives.

And in some cases, they were sharing efforts to weaken their ties to California.

It's Monday, January 12th.