Eric Rudich

So all those factors will come into play when determining first if they indicate they could be fair and impartial to begin with, but then also when both sides are evaluating whether or not to use one of their strikes on that particular juror.

It's certainly how they will respond to the follow-up questions during court. It may also come down to what type of sexual assault, when it occurred, how traumatic it was for that individual.

It's certainly how they will respond to the follow-up questions during court. It may also come down to what type of sexual assault, when it occurred, how traumatic it was for that individual.

It's certainly how they will respond to the follow-up questions during court. It may also come down to what type of sexual assault, when it occurred, how traumatic it was for that individual.

So all those factors will come into play when determining first if they indicate they could be fair and impartial to begin with, but then also when both sides are evaluating whether or not to use one of their strikes on that particular juror.

So all those factors will come into play when determining first if they indicate they could be fair and impartial to begin with, but then also when both sides are evaluating whether or not to use one of their strikes on that particular juror.

So all those factors will come into play when determining first if they indicate they could be fair and impartial to begin with, but then also when both sides are evaluating whether or not to use one of their strikes on that particular juror.

It's true to some extent, but those are, you know, the demographic characteristics that you describe are often a product of individuals' experiences. So the extent to which certain groups have certain experiences, that would be predictive of their verdict orientation. So you may want the blue collar worker, but the question is why?

It's true to some extent, but those are, you know, the demographic characteristics that you describe are often a product of individuals' experiences. So the extent to which certain groups have certain experiences, that would be predictive of their verdict orientation. So you may want the blue collar worker, but the question is why?

What about their attitudes, their life experiences, their value system that indicates that they may be favorable to your particular case?

What about their attitudes, their life experiences, their value system that indicates that they may be favorable to your particular case?

It's true to some extent, but those are, you know, the demographic characteristics that you describe are often a product of individuals' experiences. So the extent to which certain groups have certain experiences, that would be predictive of their verdict orientation. So you may want the blue collar worker, but the question is why?

It's true to some extent, but those are, you know, the demographic characteristics that you describe are often a product of individuals' experiences. So the extent to which certain groups have certain experiences, that would be predictive of their verdict orientation. So you may want the blue collar worker, but the question is why?

It's true to some extent, but those are, you know, the demographic characteristics that you describe are often a product of individuals' experiences. So the extent to which certain groups have certain experiences, that would be predictive of their verdict orientation. So you may want the blue collar worker, but the question is why?

What about their attitudes, their life experiences, their value system that indicates that they may be favorable to your particular case?

What about their attitudes, their life experiences, their value system that indicates that they may be favorable to your particular case?

What about their attitudes, their life experiences, their value system that indicates that they may be favorable to your particular case?

Often we're retained to assist with jury selection. But for a case like this, it wouldn't surprise me if the jury consultants stayed on to work with the attorneys on, let's say, their opening statements and fine-tune their opening statements based on the research that they've done. Certainly, Jury consultants are often retained on trial to assist with preparing the witnesses for their testimony.

Often we're retained to assist with jury selection. But for a case like this, it wouldn't surprise me if the jury consultants stayed on to work with the attorneys on, let's say, their opening statements and fine-tune their opening statements based on the research that they've done. Certainly, Jury consultants are often retained on trial to assist with preparing the witnesses for their testimony.

For closing arguments, jury consultants are working with the attorneys to help organize the evidence and organize their themes in a way that's persuasive to the jurors. So there's a lot more that jury consultants will do, particularly in a high-stakes case like this.