Eric Rudich

Probably someone who hasn't followed the case very closely, because I think a lot of the media attention has not been very positive to Sean Combs. Someone who's not had very favorable experiences with law enforcement. For the prosecution, you would want probably the reverse.

For the defense, I would be particularly concerned about individuals who've been victims of sexual assault. And there are probably a number of individuals who say that they were victims, but can still be fair and impartial in this case. You certainly want an individual who has kind of a...

For the defense, I would be particularly concerned about individuals who've been victims of sexual assault. And there are probably a number of individuals who say that they were victims, but can still be fair and impartial in this case. You certainly want an individual who has kind of a...

For the defense, I would be particularly concerned about individuals who've been victims of sexual assault. And there are probably a number of individuals who say that they were victims, but can still be fair and impartial in this case. You certainly want an individual who has kind of a...

You would want people who have much more traditional sexual lifestyle, maybe individuals who follow the case closely, who've started to form some opinions. Maybe you've seen the Cassandra video, individuals who have positive views of law enforcement.

You would want people who have much more traditional sexual lifestyle, maybe individuals who follow the case closely, who've started to form some opinions. Maybe you've seen the Cassandra video, individuals who have positive views of law enforcement.

I would want to know if anyone has been accused of committing a crime or have had negative experiences with law enforcement or mistrustful of prosecutors. So those are just a few of the characteristics I think each side will be looking for when they're selecting the jury in this case.

I would want to know if anyone has been accused of committing a crime or have had negative experiences with law enforcement or mistrustful of prosecutors. So those are just a few of the characteristics I think each side will be looking for when they're selecting the jury in this case.

untraditional sexual lifestyle, for example, probably someone who hasn't followed the case very closely, because I think a lot of the media attention has not been very positive to Sean Combs, someone who's not had very favorable experiences with law enforcement. For the prosecution, you would want probably the reverse.

untraditional sexual lifestyle, for example, probably someone who hasn't followed the case very closely, because I think a lot of the media attention has not been very positive to Sean Combs, someone who's not had very favorable experiences with law enforcement. For the prosecution, you would want probably the reverse.

untraditional sexual lifestyle, for example, probably someone who hasn't followed the case very closely, because I think a lot of the media attention has not been very positive to Sean Combs, someone who's not had very favorable experiences with law enforcement. For the prosecution, you would want probably the reverse.

You would want people who have much more traditional sexual lifestyle, maybe individuals who follow the case closely, who've started to form some opinions, maybe have seen the Cassandra video, Individuals who have positive views of law enforcement.

You would want people who have much more traditional sexual lifestyle, maybe individuals who follow the case closely, who've started to form some opinions, maybe have seen the Cassandra video, Individuals who have positive views of law enforcement.

You would want people who have much more traditional sexual lifestyle, maybe individuals who follow the case closely, who've started to form some opinions, maybe have seen the Cassandra video, Individuals who have positive views of law enforcement.

I would want to know if anyone has been accused of committing a crime or have had negative experiences with law enforcement or mistrustful of prosecutors. So those are just a few of the characteristics I think each side will be looking for when they're selecting the jury in this case.

I would want to know if anyone has been accused of committing a crime or have had negative experiences with law enforcement or mistrustful of prosecutors. So those are just a few of the characteristics I think each side will be looking for when they're selecting the jury in this case.

I would want to know if anyone has been accused of committing a crime or have had negative experiences with law enforcement or mistrustful of prosecutors. So those are just a few of the characteristics I think each side will be looking for when they're selecting the jury in this case.

It's certainly how they will respond to the follow-up questions during court. It may also come down to what type of sexual assault, when it occurred, how traumatic it was for that individual.

It's certainly how they will respond to the follow-up questions during court. It may also come down to what type of sexual assault, when it occurred, how traumatic it was for that individual.

So all those factors will come into play when determining first if they indicate they could be fair and impartial to begin with, but then also when both sides are evaluating whether or not to use one of their strikes on that particular juror.