Eric Rudich

And the idea is to get a representative sample like you would in a trial jury. But we're looking to see how someone who might be a juror on this case who has similar demographic and characteristics and attitudes and experiences of a prospective juror might react to the case.

And the idea is to get a representative sample like you would in a trial jury. But we're looking to see how someone who might be a juror on this case who has similar demographic and characteristics and attitudes and experiences of a prospective juror might react to the case.

So the questionnaire focuses a lot on hardship and bias, which of course it should. Overall, I'd give the juror questionnaire a B because I think there could be a lot more information included in the juror questionnaire about individuals' attitudes particularly, but it certainly works for the court to determine whether or not someone could be potentially biased.

So the questionnaire focuses a lot on hardship and bias, which of course it should. Overall, I'd give the juror questionnaire a B because I think there could be a lot more information included in the juror questionnaire about individuals' attitudes particularly, but it certainly works for the court to determine whether or not someone could be potentially biased.

Important question is what they've heard about the case, if they formed any opinions about the case that indicate that it may not be a fair and impartial juror on this particular case. There are questions about whether they've been a victim of sexual assault. There are also questions about whether they've been accused of sexually assaulting individuals.

Important question is what they've heard about the case, if they formed any opinions about the case that indicate that it may not be a fair and impartial juror on this particular case. There are questions about whether they've been a victim of sexual assault. There are also questions about whether they've been accused of sexually assaulting individuals.

So the questionnaire focuses a lot on hardship and bias, which of course it should. Overall, I'd give the juror questionnaire a B because I think there could be a lot more information included in the juror questionnaire about individuals' attitudes particularly, but it certainly works for the court to determine whether or not someone could be potentially biased.

So the questionnaire focuses a lot on hardship and bias, which of course it should. Overall, I'd give the juror questionnaire a B because I think there could be a lot more information included in the juror questionnaire about individuals' attitudes particularly, but it certainly works for the court to determine whether or not someone could be potentially biased.

So the questionnaire focuses a lot on hardship and bias, which of course it should. Overall, I'd give the juror questionnaire a B because I think there could be a lot more information included in the juror questionnaire about individuals' attitudes particularly, but it certainly works for the court to determine whether or not someone could be potentially biased.

So there are questions on there to uncover whether someone is potentially, their experiences indicate that they may be biased and may not be a fair and impartial juror in this case.

So there are questions on there to uncover whether someone is potentially, their experiences indicate that they may be biased and may not be a fair and impartial juror in this case.

Important question is what they've heard about the case, if they formed any opinions about the case that indicate that it may not be a fair and impartial juror on this particular case. There are questions about whether they've been a victim of sexual assault. There are also questions about whether they've been accused of sexually assaulting individuals.

Important question is what they've heard about the case, if they formed any opinions about the case that indicate that it may not be a fair and impartial juror on this particular case. There are questions about whether they've been a victim of sexual assault. There are also questions about whether they've been accused of sexually assaulting individuals.

Important question is what they've heard about the case, if they formed any opinions about the case that indicate that it may not be a fair and impartial juror on this particular case. There are questions about whether they've been a victim of sexual assault. There are also questions about whether they've been accused of sexually assaulting individuals.

So there are questions on there to uncover whether someone is potentially, their experiences indicate that they may be biased and may not be a fair and impartial juror in this case.

So there are questions on there to uncover whether someone is potentially, their experiences indicate that they may be biased and may not be a fair and impartial juror in this case.

So there are questions on there to uncover whether someone is potentially, their experiences indicate that they may be biased and may not be a fair and impartial juror in this case.

For the defense, I would be particularly concerned about individuals who have been victims of sexual assault. And there are probably a number of individuals who say that they were victims, but can still be fair and impartial in this case. You certainly want an individual who has kind of a untraditional sexual lifestyle, for example.

For the defense, I would be particularly concerned about individuals who have been victims of sexual assault. And there are probably a number of individuals who say that they were victims, but can still be fair and impartial in this case. You certainly want an individual who has kind of a untraditional sexual lifestyle, for example.

Probably someone who hasn't followed the case very closely, because I think a lot of the media attention has not been very positive to Sean Combs. Someone who's not had very favorable experiences with law enforcement. For the prosecution, you would want probably the reverse.