Eric Schmidt

And as that arrives, it changes huge human systems, because humans have organized themselves in various ways. We need to have a map of the arrival and the impact. I'd say the second point is that there's a set of questions that we don't know. And one of them is, where is the limit of this kind of intelligence? Let me give you an example.

It's clear to me that these things will be fantastic scientists, whatever you want to call them. Fantastic scientists, they can analyze things, they can figure stuff out, they can do math better, all that kind of stuff. Much of human behavior is really invention, strategy, and responses. We haven't seen that yet emerge in these systems.

It's clear to me that these things will be fantastic scientists, whatever you want to call them. Fantastic scientists, they can analyze things, they can figure stuff out, they can do math better, all that kind of stuff. Much of human behavior is really invention, strategy, and responses. We haven't seen that yet emerge in these systems.

So is there a limit to where the current technology will go compared to humans? In other words, will the system do 90%? But the 10% that the humans do are the stuff that humans are particularly good at, strategy, thinking about impact, understanding subtleties of humans and things like that, or will that go too? My own opinion right now is there will be a space for us for a long time.

So is there a limit to where the current technology will go compared to humans? In other words, will the system do 90%? But the 10% that the humans do are the stuff that humans are particularly good at, strategy, thinking about impact, understanding subtleties of humans and things like that, or will that go too? My own opinion right now is there will be a space for us for a long time.

That is my opinion. And I think the third thing I would mention is this question of proliferation. In all my work here, everyone likes to compare this to the nuclear proliferation problem of which Dr. Kissinger was the world's expert because he did it. And his view, which is also Craig's and mine, is that it's different.

That is my opinion. And I think the third thing I would mention is this question of proliferation. In all my work here, everyone likes to compare this to the nuclear proliferation problem of which Dr. Kissinger was the world's expert because he did it. And his view, which is also Craig's and mine, is that it's different.

But the proliferation problem for this is it's so much easier to make this technology broadly available that we have to really think about how we're going to make sure that evil people don't get access to it. And that's an issue for everyone, not just for you and me.

But the proliferation problem for this is it's so much easier to make this technology broadly available that we have to really think about how we're going to make sure that evil people don't get access to it. And that's an issue for everyone, not just for you and me.

Thank you very much, Lynn. Thank you for everything and thank you for your support.

Thank you very much, Lynn. Thank you for everything and thank you for your support.

google decided that work-life balance and going home early and working from home was more important than winning and the startups the reason startups work is because the people work like hell and i'm sorry to be so blunt but the fact of the matter is if you all leave the university and go found a company you're not going to let people work from home and only come in one day a week. Ooh.

google decided that work-life balance and going home early and working from home was more important than winning and the startups the reason startups work is because the people work like hell and i'm sorry to be so blunt but the fact of the matter is if you all leave the university and go found a company you're not going to let people work from home and only come in one day a week. Ooh.

Can you show the Starbucks clip?

Can you show the Starbucks clip?