Evaristo Salas Jr.

And so they actually took me down to the main institution right here and I was able to watch it on the Zoom.

And it was, there was three judges.

Two of them were pretty, I mean, they pushed pretty hard on the prosecutor attorney because the prosecutor was arguing not to, he was basically saying that

Well, he started out with saying that, you know, the case is over.

Everything's done.

There's no reason he can't bring up things 25 years later.

And the judge actually pushed back on it.

He was like, so you're telling me that if we've got an innocent person in prison, then because the case, the finality case is done, it happened 25 years ago, it doesn't matter anymore?

And so it was questioned, like, yeah, they hit him back.

You know, they kind of pushed back.

And then the other judge was like, so isn't it ironic that you're telling us now not to believe

disinformant, but he was your, you know, your star.

Yeah, yeah, it was obvious, they were hitting him back, and he was like, well, well, you know, yeah, and then the other judge hit him hard with that, the other judge goes, so, so basically, the response of the prosecutor, when he, when he responded to our, our brief, he responded by saying that disinformant is not trustworthy, he's this, he's a whole two or three pages of how terrible this disinformant is,

And then he listed every crime that he'd been convicted of.

This guy was one of the backbones of their case.

Exactly.

So he starts naming it off, and the judge goes, oh, he goes, what did you convict him?

And then he kind of, the prosecutor started kind of to ask, he goes, no, no, I got a list right here.

So he started naming all these things.

And he goes, so when did this start to happen?