Flip

That's all I'm saying I don't assume that the more that he if he claimed if they met in July he claimed in July then yes It's naive to think that his coverage clear but in July when we start talking about them dating and being an item the first thing everybody said was they were dating for a while before they went public the date that they had a private relationship and now they've decided to go public by the time I go public with somebody and that's why you can't say that it's crass that people online are bringing up the timeline of her relationships because that's what refutes that and

Unless they both were seeing other people and then they finally locked it down together in July, which I think is reasonable for young people to do.

Before we get to the pattern, because I think that's a great point.

All I'm saying is, it's reasonable.

To assume the NBA players or famous people, anybody who's popping is going to have other people.

It's reasonable to assume that men are going to cheat.

It's reasonable to assume that rich and powerful people are really likely to cheat.

I'm not saying it would be naive to not think that that's possible.

But at the same time, because that's not what's in dispute for me.

What I'm saying is at the same time, it's not unreasonable to assume that the person you decided to make a commitment to who's made a commitment to you can keep their word.

It's going to keep their word.

That's all I'm saying.

And so, yes, it's just like if you were to walk through three in the morning with jewelry on in a bad neighborhood.

Yeah, that's some dumb ass shit to do and you're likely going to get robbed.

But you also shouldn't rob people.

Both things can be true at the same time.

I'm saying, yeah, she might have been naive if she thought this NBA player was going to be pristine because he's the good guy.

I'm just saying, no, she still has a right to be pissed about it.

Oh, I'm not trying to take that away from you.

Like, it's not just... Yeah, yeah, no, no, no.