Fred Heiding

It's also more expensive, right?

So this is a game of resources as cybersecurity always have been because it costs tokens and everything will just become a token economy in the end.

That's how the AI will work.

And will we...

create a regulation that says you have to spend 20 of your tokens on security i don't think we will but that would be great so you just rush forward and let's take this power plants in massachusetts again right a lot of critical infrastructures owned decentralized by by private partners if they know that they can use this ai generated super fast code that just is incredibly much cheaper easier to keep up to date easier to

to work with, et cetera, et cetera.

It's not as secure as it should be, but it saves a lot of cost.

Oftentimes they'll have to do it.

They just can't afford not using it right now.

I'm just not confident we'll break long enough and we will have time to implement all the regulations to stop this.

So it could work out and that would be really good if it does.

I just see so many scenarios where, again, we have this arms race dynamic, everyone is rushing, there's a lot of cost savings to be done, and security usually doesn't fit into that cost equation until it's too late, basically.

So I'm skeptical.

I guess the only thing...

Yeah, the other thing I want to say is that we could find all the vulnerabilities today with AI.

I'm certain we could, and that's great.

The problem is that the tech is moving.

The tech infrastructure we have today will not be the one we use in one year.

It's always changing.

And that's a problem, right?