Fred Heiding

Just before that, I want to say that I really empathize with this criticism or maybe skepticism of a few companies owning all this AI chain.

I think Josephine makes a good point that cloud companies are also powerful.

We have other powerful semi-monopolies in the world.

I do believe that AI is in another category than anything we've seen before.

So I think that is

really problematic and and i would love to see more people owned ai if possible more decentralized owner structures and we could make policies right to approach that more security specific to be a little bit more

Small level for a second.

I think there's a lot of things we could do.

So Jason Clinton at Anthropic, I'm sure a lot of other people too, talks about this one day patch policy and maybe it's even shorter now.

But I think that's great, right?

Every company should be able to just patch a vulnerability within 24 hours or even much, much quicker because we just have to.

It's going to be so stressful and time dependent in the future.

We're never up.

A vulnerability is discovered.

Companies need to have the frameworks in place to just patch that instantly because we can't wait and be slow as we've been.

Even a few weeks is way too long.

I think that's such a good point.

I'm definitely seeing AI as a critical infrastructure.

And there's different arguments here.

If we make it an official 17th critical infrastructure sector in the US, maybe we'll slow development, maybe we'll create regulatory overlap, which can be problematic as well.