Gavin de Becker

And you can see – you can tell they're real by both how – what they say and also what they end up with, which is –

equal to the report they published.

But this was meant to be secret, right?

Now the second pronouncement they made, this one was dead on accurate.

The point of no return, the line we will not cross in public policy is, pull the vaccine, change the schedule, we wouldn't say compensate the injured, and we wouldn't say stop the program.

Then another one says, CDC wants us to declare, well, these things are pretty safe on a population basis and we are not ever going to come down, that autism is a true side effect.

That is the first hour of their study.

That is the first hour when they sit down to answer the question, which is, you know, might mercury or other ingredients be causing autism in any children anywhere?

Read that quote again.

Let's go back here.

CDC wants us to declare, well, these things are pretty safe on a population basis, and we are not ever going to come down that autism is a true side effect.

The CDC asked for a result.

Oh, the CDC paid for the probe.

Yeah, and everybody kind of knows it.

You know, one of the doctors asks, are we going to look at mercury?

And the answer comes back fast, saying not this round.

Now, this is the first study that the U.S.

government is doing supposedly to find out what causes autism.

But what they're actually doing is finding out what doesn't cause autism.

Right.