Geo

And he is a good defender.

But his presence on this team is confusing.

And he was one of the biggest proponents of getting rid of Tibbs in those exit interviews and was also the guy that was apparently stuck to Mike Brown during the preseason being like, all right, my role is going to expand.

My role is going to expand.

And I just don't know what he is.

So, I mean, as long as he doesn't hurt the team, I guess that's a good thing at this point.

But is there going to be a playoff game where you're like, man, without Mikael Bridges, we couldn't have won that game?

Oh, I don't know about that.

I mean, I know he's a really good defender for sure.

And at times with the Knicks, he's been a great defender.

Other times he's been actually very underwhelming, even on the defensive end.

I think while you want everybody locked in, and I'm sure he will be in the postseason,

If you're not winning games because Mikael Bridges isn't going for 15 a game, then you've got a bigger problem.

Sure.

This team has enough firepower offensively.

I agree with you.

It is odd.

It is confusing to some degree.

It's almost like you don't even realize it's on the floor sometimes.

Yeah.