Geoffrey Cain

do this and that, make your dishes, run a tank. General AI is something that can do just about anything in theory, but it's not totally clear yet whether we're ever going to reach that stage of AI that is so all powerful. What I think victory looks like, if it is possible to reach that stage, victory will be whoever hits general AI. And if China is able to reach that stage before the United States

it would be very alarming because it would mean that there would be an all-powerful intelligent AI that can hack systems, that can wage cyber warfare, that can maneuver around an American telecommunications infrastructure, that can take control of missiles. Now, I don't mean to sound like it's the movie Terminator or something, or the robots are going to come alive.

it would be very alarming because it would mean that there would be an all-powerful intelligent AI that can hack systems, that can wage cyber warfare, that can maneuver around an American telecommunications infrastructure, that can take control of missiles. Now, I don't mean to sound like it's the movie Terminator or something, or the robots are going to come alive.

it would be very alarming because it would mean that there would be an all-powerful intelligent AI that can hack systems, that can wage cyber warfare, that can maneuver around an American telecommunications infrastructure, that can take control of missiles. Now, I don't mean to sound like it's the movie Terminator or something, or the robots are going to come alive.

I'm not sure that's actually going to happen. But if AI does get that powerful, that it can take on many tasks and exponentially learn from

I'm not sure that's actually going to happen. But if AI does get that powerful, that it can take on many tasks and exponentially learn from

I'm not sure that's actually going to happen. But if AI does get that powerful, that it can take on many tasks and exponentially learn from

from them and China gets there first or any hostile government gets there first, that would be a serious problem for democracies everywhere because we would have to contend with something that's infinitely smarter than us that even our systems cannot respond to.

from them and China gets there first or any hostile government gets there first, that would be a serious problem for democracies everywhere because we would have to contend with something that's infinitely smarter than us that even our systems cannot respond to.

from them and China gets there first or any hostile government gets there first, that would be a serious problem for democracies everywhere because we would have to contend with something that's infinitely smarter than us that even our systems cannot respond to.

That's bullshit. Total bullshit. Say more. Yeah, that's the lead up. That's what people said before World War I. It was a time of wonderful flourishing of technology, of free trade, of really the first vestiges of what would today look like globalization. I mean, that was late Belle Epoque.

That's bullshit. Total bullshit. Say more. Yeah, that's the lead up. That's what people said before World War I. It was a time of wonderful flourishing of technology, of free trade, of really the first vestiges of what would today look like globalization. I mean, that was late Belle Epoque.

That's bullshit. Total bullshit. Say more. Yeah, that's the lead up. That's what people said before World War I. It was a time of wonderful flourishing of technology, of free trade, of really the first vestiges of what would today look like globalization. I mean, that was late Belle Epoque.

when the world was becoming more prosperous, more industrialized, and traditional borders were not looking the same as they had in the past. But that was the lead up to World War I. And part of the reason is because of national pride, nationalism. It was the world going to war because, you know, for no particular reason at all, it wasn't even clear why the world was at war.

when the world was becoming more prosperous, more industrialized, and traditional borders were not looking the same as they had in the past. But that was the lead up to World War I. And part of the reason is because of national pride, nationalism. It was the world going to war because, you know, for no particular reason at all, it wasn't even clear why the world was at war.

when the world was becoming more prosperous, more industrialized, and traditional borders were not looking the same as they had in the past. But that was the lead up to World War I. And part of the reason is because of national pride, nationalism. It was the world going to war because, you know, for no particular reason at all, it wasn't even clear why the world was at war.

But that pride that comes before the fall is something to certainly be wary of.

But that pride that comes before the fall is something to certainly be wary of.

But that pride that comes before the fall is something to certainly be wary of.

I don't necessarily think that we should ban it. I wouldn't use the word ban, but I do believe in reciprocity when it comes to trade. And I do think that we should look at finding ways to separate Chinese AI companies that are accessible in the US. Those should ultimately be controlled by either friendly countries or US companies. And the reason is because of reciprocity.