George Mack

Do you guys... Intellectuals oftentimes get in this territory where they try to use proof by counterexample.

So they'll try to find one counterexample in something that you're saying and then effectively void the whole thing.

It's a very common thing because this is what you do in...

math setting or anything and they they tend to do that in kind of a religious setting as well and it's like that's not applicable here just because xyz x is not true doesn't mean invalidates the rest of it um and this is why people tend to like you know i think richard dawkins is like religion is a pick and choose kind of buffet you know you can go pick and believe in something he also did say that ai is uh sentient with claudia how old's richard though now 70s

What do you guys think of that?

The Richard Dawkins play?

I mean, if anybody would go around and figure out if there is sentience associated with AI, maybe Richard Dawkins might be an okay person to go and figure that out.

I don't know.

I don't know how much you guys... But I'm curious to get your thoughts on what he discovered or how he discovered it.

Yeah.

Oh, my God.

Amazing.

I have another dumb question, which is, how do most people, or normal people, think about meaning?

Like, how do they define it?

What is the underlying element of it?

What do you do, Tim?

What do you do?

Like, you know, this is a canonical question that people ask.

It's like, Oh, what do I do?

What do you do?