Ginny Andersen

that they're not negatively impacted.

It's been very unclear and there's been mixed messages from the Indian side and New Zealand negotiators as to what that $33 billion entails and what the penalties for New Zealand businesses are.

There is still information that has not been presented that we have asked for, and it has taken an incredibly long time for that information to come out.

It did not come out straight away.

It's been drip-free.

Signing a free trade agreement, if you don't have a majority support in Parliament, and at this point they don't because New Zealand First, their coalition partner, isn't supporting it, would be recklessly irresponsible, and we take that role incredibly seriously.

Okay, Mark.

There has been different information we've had, and this is reports back from our two spokespeople, of what the perception of the understanding on the Indian side is versus what the New Zealand side is, specifically in relation to what happens after 15 years when that $33 billion of investment is not reached.

Why didn't he just give that information up front if he wanted our support?

If he's expecting over support, he should have been up front and given all that information.

They're getting unfairly targeted because one of your own ministers is targeting them.

is absolutely racist, and Christopher Luxon, his responsibility as the leader of our country to call it out for the racism he is, and it reflects on him negatively that he's failed to do that.

Good morning, Mark.

I'm in Napier and it's very sunny right now.

You're playing mini-golf on the foreshore?

No, no.

We had a public meeting on the job losses in Watties and McCain closing.

So that was last night.

It's a really good way of understanding exactly what's happening.

So we had growers, we had people who were workers.