Greg Isenberg

The models are really good.

The context matters plus the harness.

Right.

So, for example, there was this benchmark, although I'm not 100 percent supporting it, that there was a difference between the quality of output.

That cursor generated versus cloud code versus codex.

Right.

So what that tells me is that we've reached a point where the models are really, really good.

They're probably going to get better.

The next iteration is probably going to get better.

But the harness and the tools that you surrounded, the context that you give it is going to matter even more.

And just like in everything in life, less is more, right?

Like building up step by step, making it productive for you first before you add the shiny new thing.

Like, because I tried all these tools all the time, like especially paperclip.

Paperclip blew up and a lot of people have been talking about it and it's fantastic.

But I'm willing to bet if people took two weeks to build up to the version, because you can prompt open cloud to do all that stuff.

If they built up their own version of Paperclip in two, three weeks where like they're building things that they actually need, their productivity level will skyrocket through the roof.

It's a hot take.

It's a hot take.

Might get me in trouble.

No, it won't get... Who's it going to get you in trouble with?