Greg Miller

I, as a reviewer who did not vibe with this game whatsoever, I think it's silly to put into the conversation of this.

Crimson Desert is just a piece of art that either resonates with you or doesn't resonate with you.

think that's the long and short of it where it's like the games you're talking about here had like no man's sky is a completely different game when we read what they're doing right now and maybe that'll be the thing with Crimson Desert but what they're doing here is adding more fast travel points fixing clunky combat you know like that's not the same as oh shit we didn't have aliens in the game or whatever the fuck it was you know what I mean we didn't deliver any of the promises Crimson Desert is something that has already come out and already spoken loudly to an audience that people love it and are obsessed with it and it's like to your point Crimson

For somebody like me, unfixable?

Yeah, like, I don't like Cliff and I don't... His story as a Greymane and what they're doing with the world there.

Really cool puzzles.

Combat that's easy to get into.

Challenging boss fights I bump into.

That's all great, but if there isn't a narrative backbone to what I'm doing, if I don't care about the world, then I'm just doing things.

And I can go do those things, as I said in my review, in Zelda, in Starfield, in The Witcher.

Like, there's a million different games to go get...

the pillars that crimson desert is based on and go from there yeah so yeah for me that i don't think it's a broken game at all i think it's just a game that appeals to a kind of gamer that isn't me of course i think the people who are playing it are going to really enjoy that and appreciate the updates like you talked about that's what it's here for fuck yeah and

I think you see it with the streamers.

You see it with the subreddit.

You see it with the thing.

There's this...

type of player who just wants stuff to do.

And that's what we were saying.

People were obviously trying to turn it around and fight people.

I think it was Schreier who was talking about it's content for content's sake.