Greg Rusedski

Okay, so let's go into mine.

Back then they said you can't test positive for nandrolin through food.

We've seen multiple cases now where you can test it through the food.

The way it's tested in the lab has changed completely because of these cases as well.

So the testing at the time was not 100% perfect the way it was done.

They can show now whether it's food, whether it's supplements, whether it's contamination, how it happens, whether you're taking those amounts.

So having gone through the case and having written a book, I actually go into really a lot of detail on this so people can understand it.

And you've got to look at the areas.

What is a grain of salt that can be a fluctuation of body or from a tablet that was given to me?

I tested all my substances.

If there was one thing from my product, I would have had 20 million in liable to the company and they would have disappeared.

I could not test from the company that gave me the product.

I did not know the name of the product.

So how am I supposed to defend myself?

So under strict liability, which is now, I was under the exact same rules and I was exonerated 100%, no anti-doping violation whatsoever.

And mine was made public.

There's many cases that have been made publicly

quiet and under the radar on these things in the past which we will never possibly know about as well so for me I look at sport and I look at tennis overall I look at it as a clean sport there's so many different things you have to do I mean

You look at it, you get tested with blood.

You get tested with urine.