Greg Rusedski

And I've gone through this.

Out of the top 120 players in the world, 47 of them had the exact same analytical fingerprint.

And it had to be the same substance that came into them with the way they got contaminated.

On top of that, there's been reports and letters about how it's been processed through lab.

And because of my case and the other players' cases, the way they test now is completely and utterly different because they have something called active urine.

So the onus is the strict liability is there.

And at the end of the day, they cannot be telling players don't take vitamins, don't take substance when they're handing them out to the players.

So they have liability.

They've actually broken their own rules.

And that could be the only thing

that all the players had taken, that it could have been the electrolytes.

I still never know to this day.

I tested all my products, all my things, and I'm 100% innocent of the charges.

So for me, personally, that has been a very difficult time in my life, for my family, for everybody around me.

But I proved I was 100% innocent.

There was no question about it.

The person who prosecuted has actually written saying, we have changed the laws because of your case, because I had a grain of salt in the side of Wembley Arena in my body.

They did not know the science, how it worked properly.

And if they've changed the markers, having the amount I had in my body could actually have been a mistake of the lab, could have been a false positive, or the electrolytes are the only three options they could be.

And the only thing that made sense was the electrolytes at the time.