Hannah Frey

And then when you wake up, I think you confabulate a lot of what that dream was.

Stitch it together, stitch it together and it makes sense.

And then you remember it very differently than it was when it happened.

So that's the biggest problem for this, like recording people's dreams idea.

But if we're able to figure out what you're dreaming about or what you're looking at or what you saw in the past.

Well, then should we be allowed to use that as evidence against you?

Yeah.

It makes a lot of sense to me.

I think we should protect people.

people's thoughts.

And by extension today, I think that we should protect what's on their phones because it's basically just a prosthetic brain.

And if your case requires breaking into someone's private mind or private phone, then you don't have a good enough case.

OK, today, I believe that.

Yeah, I think that eventually we're going to need to have a much clearer idea of just how private someone's phone is, because while legally it seems to be the case that pretty much all courts are agreeing that your passcode is protected and you don't have to give it, your phone itself is not.

So if the police take the phone and you refuse to give them your password or your like symbol or whatever, they can still take it down to headquarters and hack into it.

And that's completely allowed.

That's not a violation of your Fifth Amendment rights.

Okay.

Sorry, Mafia bosses.

We might have given you incorrect advice earlier.