Hannah Frey

Yeah, right.

I should have.

I should have mentioned that.

Yeah.

Now they're coming for our families.

That makes it feel a little complicated because in that case, the P300, is it equivalent to compelling testimony against myself?

Or is it the same as them just like looking around in my house with a warrant?

Could they get a warrant for my brain?

Yeah.

And you know what?

If we could accurately search people's brains and issue warrants for a search like that, a lot fewer innocent people would be punished or convicted.

The problem then becomes...

If they can look into my brain, they'll find that I didn't commit the crime that I'm charged with.

But they might also find some embarrassing thoughts I've had or some other crimes I've been a part of.

So I don't know how they would have to devise these brain searchers to like you're only allowed to search memories from this time to this time.

And you're only allowed to look at their memories involving this particular glove, you know.

I think we can we can concoct a technique in our minds that is satisfactory to us.

But at the moment, it's very nascent.

Like this technology is only so good.

And that's predominantly why courts have been turning down P300 scans, because it's just still too unknown how accurate it really is.