Harry Stebbings

One of my friends is Jason Lampkin from Sasta, and he says that we'll get to a stage where it could be up to like $10,000 per month per developer.

Okay, it's not a productivity tool, but we do look at productivity gains as a measure of effectiveness.

We are X more percent productive.

We create X percent more code in less time, whatever, whatever.

Are we actually seeing productivity increases in terms of output that are meaningful and measurable, do you think?

Would you say agentic coding tools have product market fit?

I know that sounds utterly ridiculous when you look at Cognition's $10 billion price and Cursor's $28 billion price.

You'd say, of course they do, you moron.

But if you have customers that are genuinely questioning productivity gains and kind of going, nah, do they?

Does it make 1x devs or engineers 10x?

Or does it make 10x, 100x?

Who does it favor, the lower quality or the higher quality?

Would you say in five years' time, we will have more or less engineers in dev teams?

Do we see the collapsing of roles?

When we look across the dev spectrum now, you know, you've got products, you've got ends, you've got design.

Do we see the collapsing into these like superhuman product builders or do functions remain intact?

How do you think about the shittiness of prosumer, but then also the challenge of needing to go in top down from enterprise and get adoption, which is much harder?

Do you worry about the security of a lot of these builders?

When you look at a lovables or a rat place, you know, security is often questioned.

Do your margins matter?