Host (Jeff)

I go back to 2007.

So why wouldn't the TMO disagree?

You do the NFL thing, yeah, yeah, yeah.

Well, I think it comes down to, obviously, Super Rugby only has so much money to be putting into things.

And if you look at the cricket scenario and you see in Australia, cricket Australia has the best technology.

If you go to Bangladesh last night... Don't ask the English.

They may be, but what I'm saying is that there's different technology and the affordability of different technology.

I mean, how many times are we going to see a four-pass that's marginal like that that's going to require that grid technology?

They're going to say, we're going to put the money into something else.

Yeah, but that would be a different tournament, so that would be World Rugby.

And so the protocols for World Rugby are very different to what we're seeing at the Super Rugby level.

Am I sponsoring this podcast?

Is there any other sports podcasts I can go on that are going to be agreeable to me?

I found it interesting that Dolman was so far back from play and was very, very quick and very definitive on the whistle to say that it was a try.

He might have had what he thought to be was a clear picture of the grounding and therefore he didn't see the foot.

I think then a conversation's had with the AR, who is in great position to look down the line, but he's obstructed by players that are coming across.

He would have said, I don't have vision on that.

It would have gone to the TMO.

He would have said, let me check.

That's when it would have gone upstairs.